<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-association-for-molecular-pathology-v-u-s-patent-and-trademark-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Remands ACLU Gene Patenting Case To Appeals Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/supreme-court-remands-aclu-gene-patenting-case-to-appeals-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/supreme-court-remands-aclu-gene-patenting-case-to-appeals-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=129647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.enewspf.com/latest-news/health-and-fitness/32032-supreme-court-remands-aclu-gene-patenting-case-to-appeals-court-.html">enewspf.com</a>: The U.S. Supreme Court today set aside a ruling that allowed a company to patent two genes linked to breast and ovarian cancer and limit access to potentially life-saving genetic tests for at-risk women.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/supreme-court-remands-aclu-gene-patenting-case-to-appeals-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/27/supreme-court-remands-aclu-gene-patenting-case-to-appeals-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gene Patent in Cancer Test Upheld by Federal Appeals Panel</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/29/gene-patent-in-cancer-test-upheld-by-federal-appeals-panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/29/gene-patent-in-cancer-test-upheld-by-federal-appeals-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court ruled that DNA isolated from the body was eligible for patents because it was “markedly different” in its chemical structure from DNA that exists in the body. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/29/gene-patent-in-cancer-test-upheld-by-federal-appeals-panel/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/29/gene-patent-in-cancer-test-upheld-by-federal-appeals-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama admin: No patent on human genes</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/obama-admin-no-patent-on-human-genes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/obama-admin-no-patent-on-human-genes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=79457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lyle Denniston <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/10/u-s-no-patent-on-human-genes/">writing at SCOTUSblog</a>: "Drawing a sharp distinction between 'nature’s handiwork' and human invention, the Obama Administration <a href="http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/US-brief-CAFC-on-gene-patents-10-29-101.pdf">has urged</a> a federal appeals court to rule that no U.S. patent can be issued to give sole rights to a natural gene taken out of the body and used for medical research. The stance is directly contrary to long-standing government policy. The issue almost surely is headed  ultimately to the Supreme Court." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/obama-admin-no-patent-on-human-genes/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/01/obama-admin-no-patent-on-human-genes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case Against Gene Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/16/the-case-against-gene-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/16/the-case-against-gene-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/16/the-case-against-gene-patents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joseph Stiglitz and John Sulston write at the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303348504575183982493601368.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">Wall Street Journal</a> full access via <a href="http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&#038;pz=1&#038;cf=all&#038;ned=us&#038;hl=en&#038;q=%22The+Case+against+gene+patents%22">Google News</a>: "Genetic sequences are naturally occurring things, not inventions. No company should be allowed to monopolize research on them." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/16/the-case-against-gene-patents/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/16/the-case-against-gene-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Law of Nature&#8217; or &#8216;Invention&#8217;? Court Mulls Patentability of Genes</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/03/law-of-nature-or-invention-court-mulls-patentability-of-genes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/03/law-of-nature-or-invention-court-mulls-patentability-of-genes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=50781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202441930570&#038;src=EMC-Email&#038;et=editorial&#038;bu=Law.com&#038;pt=Law.com%20Newswire%20Update&#038;cn=LAWCOM_NewswireUpdate_20100203&#038;kw='Law%20of%20Nature'%20or%20'Invention'%3F%20Court%20Mulls%20Patentability%20of%20Genes">Law.com (NY Law Journal)</a>: "The case, <em>Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office</em>, 09-civ-4515, centers on whether genes, once separated from the lengthy DNA sequence, are sufficiently "new and useful" to be deemed patentable under federal patent law." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/03/law-of-nature-or-invention-court-mulls-patentability-of-genes/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/03/law-of-nature-or-invention-court-mulls-patentability-of-genes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Allows Constitutional Challenge to Human Gene Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/04/judge-allows-constitutional-challenge-to-human-gene-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/04/judge-allows-constitutional-challenge-to-human-gene-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=41308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Opponents of patenting human gene sequences were handed a rare court victory Monday, when a federal judge refused to dismiss a suit challenging patents for two genes tied to cancers in women." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/04/judge-allows-constitutional-challenge-to-human-gene-patents/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/04/judge-allows-constitutional-challenge-to-human-gene-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

