<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Astrue v. Capato</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-astrue-v-capato/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Klukowski: Supreme Court Rules Social Security Can Deny Benefits To Children Conceived After Death Of Father</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/22/ken-klukowski-supreme-court-rules-social-security-can-deny-benefits-to-children-conceived-after-death-of-father/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/22/ken-klukowski-supreme-court-rules-social-security-can-deny-benefits-to-children-conceived-after-death-of-father/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Astrue v. Capato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Klukowski at <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/22/social-security-dead-child">Breitbart</a>: A deceased man’s child is not always a child under Florida law when it comes to Social Security benefits. So said the Supreme Court in Astrue v. Capato, a case where modern technology collided with federal entitlements.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/22/ken-klukowski-supreme-court-rules-social-security-can-deny-benefits-to-children-conceived-after-death-of-father/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/22/ken-klukowski-supreme-court-rules-social-security-can-deny-benefits-to-children-conceived-after-death-of-father/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unanimous SCOTUS: IVF children conceived after dad&#8217;s death not covered by Social Security</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/scotus-children-conceived-after-fathers-death-not-covered-by-social-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/scotus-children-conceived-after-fathers-death-not-covered-by-social-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Astrue v. Capato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=134158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SCOTUS Blog: Case Information Page and Document Links _____________ SCOTUS Ruling here: Astrue v. Capato, No. 11-159 Eighteen months after her husband, Robert Capato, died of cancer, respondent Karen Capato gave birth to twins conceived through in vitro fertilization using &#8230; <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/scotus-children-conceived-after-fathers-death-not-covered-by-social-security/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/21/scotus-children-conceived-after-fathers-death-not-covered-by-social-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justices Weigh IVF Technology Against 1939 Law: Is a posthumous IVF child a &#8220;survivor?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/20/justices-weigh-ivf-technology-against-1939-law-is-a-posthumous-ivf-child-a-survivor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/20/justices-weigh-ivf-technology-against-1939-law-is-a-posthumous-ivf-child-a-survivor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Astrue v. Capato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=129151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nina Totenberg reports at <a href="http://www.npr.org/2012/03/19/148935151/justices-weigh-ivf-technology-against-1939-law">NPR (includes audio)</a>: ustices Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy both raised an issue not before the court — whether a child conceived in vitro can be properly called a survivor since the child never lived with or was dependent on the deceased.

<a href="http://howappealing.law.com/031912.html#045106">How Appealing links</a> to more reports on the arguments. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/20/justices-weigh-ivf-technology-against-1939-law-is-a-posthumous-ivf-child-a-survivor/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/20/justices-weigh-ivf-technology-against-1939-law-is-a-posthumous-ivf-child-a-survivor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: Benefits for babies born after dad&#8217;s death?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/court-benefits-for-babies-born-after-dads-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/court-benefits-for-babies-born-after-dads-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Astrue v. Capato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=128989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_ARTIFICIAL_INSEMINATION?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2012-03-19-12-02-07">AP</a>: Should babies conceived through artificial insemination after a father's death get his Social Security survivor benefits? <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/court-benefits-for-babies-born-after-dads-death/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/19/court-benefits-for-babies-born-after-dads-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS Argument Preview: Who is a decedent&#8217;s child?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/15/scotus-argument-preview-who-is-a-decedents-child/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/15/scotus-argument-preview-who-is-a-decedents-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Astrue v. Capato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=128705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/03/argument-preview-who-is-a-decedents-child/">SCOTUS Blog</a>: The following contribution is by Kristine S. Knaplund, Professor of Law at Pepperdine University School of Law in Malibu, California.  Professor Knaplund has written extensively on the legal and ethical issues that arise when children are conceived and born years after a genetic parent has died, including articles in the Arizona Law Review, Kansas Law Review, the Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, the Michigan Journal of Law Review, and the ABA Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal.  She is an Academic Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel, and serves as Vice Chair of the ABA Elder Law, Disability Planning and Bioethics Group. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/15/scotus-argument-preview-who-is-a-decedents-child/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/03/15/scotus-argument-preview-who-is-a-decedents-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top court to hear in vitro fertilization benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/14/top-court-to-hear-in-vitro-fertilization-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/14/top-court-to-hear-in-vitro-fertilization-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Astrue v. Capato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=118548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court said on Monday it would decide whether children conceived through in vitro fertilization after the death of their parent were entitled to survivor benefits under the Social Security law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/14/top-court-to-hear-in-vitro-fertilization-benefits/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/14/top-court-to-hear-in-vitro-fertilization-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

