<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-awad-v-ziriax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>10th Circuit upholds stay of Oklahoma ban on Islamic law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/10/10th-circuit-upholds-stay-of-oklahoma-ban-on-islamic-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/10/10th-circuit-upholds-stay-of-oklahoma-ban-on-islamic-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=122523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newsok.com/article/3639122">NewsOK.com</a>: A federal appeals court has upheld a judge's order blocking an amendment to the Oklahoma Constitution that would ban state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases. &#124; <a href="http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/10/10-6273.pdf"><em>Awad v. Ziriax</em></a>, No. 10-6273 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/10/10th-circuit-upholds-stay-of-oklahoma-ban-on-islamic-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/10/10th-circuit-upholds-stay-of-oklahoma-ban-on-islamic-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10th Circuit Hears Arguments On Anti-Shariah Amendment As Muslim Group Endorses Michigan&#8217;s Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/13/10th-circuit-hears-arguments-on-anti-shariah-amendment-as-muslim-group-endorses-michigans-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/13/10th-circuit-hears-arguments-on-anti-shariah-amendment-as-muslim-group-endorses-michigans-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 10th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=113368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2011/09/10th-circuit-hears-arguments-on-anti.html">Religion Clause</a>: Yesterday, the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Awad v. Ziriax, a case challenging the constitutionality of Oklahoma's voter-approved constitutional amendment that bans state courts from considering international law or Shariah law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/13/10th-circuit-hears-arguments-on-anti-shariah-amendment-as-muslim-group-endorses-michigans-bill/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/13/10th-circuit-hears-arguments-on-anti-shariah-amendment-as-muslim-group-endorses-michigans-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge issues injunction against Okla. sharia amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/29/judge-issues-injunction-against-okla-sharia-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/29/judge-issues-injunction-against-okla-sharia-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=84271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["[T]he Court finds that plaintiff has shown that he will suffer an injury in fact, specifically, an invasion of his First Amendment rights which is concrete, particularized and imminent." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/29/judge-issues-injunction-against-okla-sharia-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/29/judge-issues-injunction-against-okla-sharia-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Order blocking Okla. Islamic law measure extended</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/order-blocking-okla-islamic-law-measure-extended/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/order-blocking-okla-islamic-law-measure-extended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=83549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ISLAMIC_LAW_LAWSUIT?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2010-11-22-17-05-15">Associated Press</a>: "A federal judge on Monday said she would rule by the end of the month on a lawsuit challenging an Oklahoma constitutional amendment that would prohibit state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/order-blocking-okla-islamic-law-measure-extended/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/order-blocking-okla-islamic-law-measure-extended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Okla. sharia law dispute goes to court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/okla-sharia-law-dispute-goes-to-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/okla-sharia-law-dispute-goes-to-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=83305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/21/sharia-law-dispute-goes-to-court/">Washington Times</a>: "A federal judge will hear arguments Monday on a preliminary injunction against one of the most contentious ballot measures in this month's elections -- an Oklahoma referendum that banned state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/okla-sharia-law-dispute-goes-to-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/22/okla-sharia-law-dispute-goes-to-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OK: Judge details rationale for halting anti-Sharia law measure</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/10/ok-judge-details-rationale-for-halting-anti-sharia-law-measure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/10/ok-judge-details-rationale-for-halting-anti-sharia-law-measure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Case Filings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=81451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1110/Judge_details_rationale_for_halting_antiShariah_Law_measure.html">Politico</a>: "In a <a href="http://www.politico.com/static/PPM152_101109_shariah_tro.html">nine-page order released Tuesday</a>, U.S. District Court Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange said she was persuaded that a constitutional amendment known as State Question 755 seemed to have a legally improper religious purpose and posed a threat to violate the rights of Muslims . . . "

Ed Whelan <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/252908/re-judicial-mischief-oklahoma-ed-whelan">comments at Bench Memos</a>.

Eugene Volokh <a href="http://volokh.com/2010/11/09/district-court-temporarily-enjoins-oklahoma-no-use-of-shariah-law-in-court-constitutional-amendment/">writing at The Volokh Conspiracy</a>: "I’m no fan of the amendment, which would also apparently ban the use of foreign law in Oklahoma courts, even in situations — such as disputes about whether two people were validly married in a foreign country, enforcement of contracts that provide for the use of (say) British law, and tort litigation over conduct that happened in a foreign country — where foreign law has long been used under standard choice-of-law principles. And it’s also possible that the specific ban on the use of Sharia law might be unconstitutional, though that depends on exactly how the amendment is interpreted. But my tentative sense is that the plaintiff doesn’t have standing to challenge the ban on the use of Sharia." &#124; <a href="http://volokh.com/2010/11/10/standing-to-challenge-laws-that-allegedly-endorse-or-disapprove-of-religion/">More from Volokh on standing</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/10/ok-judge-details-rationale-for-halting-anti-sharia-law-measure/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/10/ok-judge-details-rationale-for-halting-anti-sharia-law-measure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ed Whelan on the TRO barring Oklahoma&#8217;s sharia law amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/09/ed-whelan-on-the-tro-barring-oklahomas-sharia-law-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/09/ed-whelan-on-the-tro-barring-oklahomas-sharia-law-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Case Filings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=81264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed Whelan <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/252908/re-judicial-mischief-oklahoma-ed-whelan">writing at National Review / Bench Memos</a>:"<a href="http://www.politico.com/static/PPM152_101109_shariah_tro.html">Here</a>’s the judge’s opinion . . . I don’t see how the plaintiff’s proffered evidence shows that the amendment’s 'actual purpose is to disapprove of plaintiff’s faith.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/09/ed-whelan-on-the-tro-barring-oklahomas-sharia-law-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/09/ed-whelan-on-the-tro-barring-oklahomas-sharia-law-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal court blocks voter approved Oklahoma constitutional amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/08/federal-court-blocks-voter-approved-oklahoma-constitutional-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/08/federal-court-blocks-voter-approved-oklahoma-constitutional-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=80956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=14&#038;articleid=20101108_11_0_OKLAHO357431">Tulsa World</a>: "A federal judge on Monday issued an order temporarily blocking certification of the election results for a state question banning the use of Shariah law." Article includes video. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/08/federal-court-blocks-voter-approved-oklahoma-constitutional-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/08/federal-court-blocks-voter-approved-oklahoma-constitutional-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muslim&#8217;s lawsuit says Okla. amendment violates Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/muslims-lawsuit-says-okla-amendment-violates-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/muslims-lawsuit-says-okla-amendment-violates-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Awad v. Ziriax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Case Filings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=80531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cair-muslims-lawsuit-says-okla-amendment-violates-constitution-106718503.html">PR Newswire</a>: "The Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-OK) today announced the filing of a lawsuit that claims an anti-Islam state ballot measure (SQ 755) passed in Tuesday's election violates the U.S. Constitution." (links to relevant documents) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/muslims-lawsuit-says-okla-amendment-violates-constitution/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/04/muslims-lawsuit-says-okla-amendment-violates-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

