<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Bauer v. Shepard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-bauer-v-shepard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Judges, Abortion Foes Want Supreme Court to Weigh In on Judicial Campaign Speeches</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/judges-abortion-foes-want-supreme-court-to-weigh-in-on-judicial-campaign-speeches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/judges-abortion-foes-want-supreme-court-to-weigh-in-on-judicial-campaign-speeches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bauer v. Shepard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Caperton v. Massey Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Republican Party of Minnesota v. White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Siefert v. Alexander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=74489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202472721201&#038;src=EMC-Email&#038;et=editorial&#038;bu=Law.com&#038;pt=Law.com%20Newswire%20Update&#038;cn=LAWCOM_NewswireUpdate_20100930&#038;kw=Judges,%20Abortion%20Foes%20Want%20Supreme%20Court%20to%20Weigh%20In%20on%20Judicial%20Campaign%20Speeches">National Law Journal (Law.com)</a>: "A group of state judges, judicial hopefuls and an anti-abortion organization has taken its challenge to a broad range of restrictions on campaign speech by judicial candidates to the U.S. Supreme Court. A longtime foe of those restrictions, James Bopp Jr. of Bopp, Coleson &#038; Bostrom, in Terre Haute, Ind., has filed two petitions for review . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/judges-abortion-foes-want-supreme-court-to-weigh-in-on-judicial-campaign-speeches/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/judges-abortion-foes-want-supreme-court-to-weigh-in-on-judicial-campaign-speeches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Asked to Review Laws Banning Campaign Speech for Judges</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: James Madison Center for Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bauer v. Shepard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Siefert v. Alexander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A collection of judges, judicial candidates, and advocacy groups from two states are seeking Supreme Court review of state regulations that place limits on the ability of judicial candidates to campaign for judicial office.
  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/supreme-court-asked-to-review-laws-banning-campaign-speech-for-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-life group loses 7th Circuit challenge to judicial campaign ethics rule</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/25/pro-life-group-loses-7th-circuit-challenge-to-judicial-campaign-ethics-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/25/pro-life-group-loses-7th-circuit-challenge-to-judicial-campaign-ethics-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 7th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bauer v. Shepard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=70232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202471045099">Law.com</a>: "The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed on a technicality a lower court that upheld the state's Code of Judicial Conduct, which bars judges and candidates in judicial elections from making statements that are 'inconsistent with the impartial performance of judicial office.' The court dismissed the case, brought by Indiana Right to Life Inc., as unripe. The defendants were the Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications and the Indiana Disciplinary Commission." <a href="../../2010/2010082001.pdf"><em>Bauer v. Shephard</em></a>, No. 09-2963 (7th Cir. Aug. 20, 2010) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/25/pro-life-group-loses-7th-circuit-challenge-to-judicial-campaign-ethics-rule/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/25/pro-life-group-loses-7th-circuit-challenge-to-judicial-campaign-ethics-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7th Circuit addresses Indiana Right to Life challenge to Code of Judicial Conduct</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/7th-circuit-addresses-indiana-right-to-life-challenge-to-code-of-judicial-conduct/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/7th-circuit-addresses-indiana-right-to-life-challenge-to-code-of-judicial-conduct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 7th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bauer v. Shepard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/2010082001.pdf"><em>Bauer v. Shephard</em></a>, No. 09-2963 (7th Cir. Aug. 20, 2010)

Election Law Blog: <a href="http://electionlawblog.org/archives/016770.html">Judge Easterbrook Writes Important Judicial Speech Code Decision About Indiana's Rules</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/7th-circuit-addresses-indiana-right-to-life-challenge-to-code-of-judicial-conduct/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/20/7th-circuit-addresses-indiana-right-to-life-challenge-to-code-of-judicial-conduct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

