<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Beljakovic v. Longin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-beljakovic-v-longin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NJ Appeals Court abstains from ecclesiastical dispute where member is excluded from church property</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/nj-appeals-court-abstains-from-ecclesiastical-dispute-where-member-is-excluded-from-church-property/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/nj-appeals-court-abstains-from-ecclesiastical-dispute-where-member-is-excluded-from-church-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Church Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Beljakovic v. Longin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In <a href="http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a5330-09.pdf"><em> Beljakovic v. Longin</em></a>, No. A-5330-09T4 (N.J. App. Div. (per curiam) July 18, 2011) "Moreover, plaintiff sought  an injunction to end his continued exclusion from church property, as defendant Micic has prevented plaintiff’s reinstatement every year at the annual meeting. Yet, due to the ecclesiastical subject matter of the entire complaint, even if any claim survived the statute of limitations hurdle, we must decline to take jurisdiction." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/nj-appeals-court-abstains-from-ecclesiastical-dispute-where-member-is-excluded-from-church-property/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/28/nj-appeals-court-abstains-from-ecclesiastical-dispute-where-member-is-excluded-from-church-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

