<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Bellevue Sch. Dist. v. E.S.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-bellevue-sch-dist-v-e-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WA Supreme Court: Due Process does not require &#8220;right to counsel&#8221; in early stages of truancy proceedings</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/09/wa-supreme-court-due-process-does-not-require-right-to-counsel-in-early-stages-of-truancy-proceedings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/09/wa-supreme-court-due-process-does-not-require-right-to-counsel-in-early-stages-of-truancy-proceedings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bellevue Sch. Dist. v. E.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=105930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/?fa=opinions.disp&#038;filename=830240MAJ">Bellevue Sch. Dist. v. E.S.</a></em>, No. 83024-0 (Wash. Jun. 9, 2011)(<a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/?fa=opinions.disp&#038;filename=830240Co1">Concurrence</a>) (<a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/?fa=opinions.disp&#038;filename=830240Di1">Dissent</a>)

We are asked to decide whether the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution or the due process clause 
set forth in article I, section 3 of the Washington Constitution requires appointment of counsel to represent a child at an initial truancy hearing.  
The Court of Appeals, Division One held that due process protections compel appointment of counsel at that stage of a truancy proceeding.  We hold that the Court of Appeals erred in making that determination and, therefore, reverse its decision . . . 

For reasons set forth above, we hold that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not require that appointed counsel represent a child in an initial truancy hearing.  We conclude, additionally, that in this context the Gunwall factors do not support an independent inquiry under article I, section 3 of the Washington Constitution.  The Court of Appeals is reversed. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/09/wa-supreme-court-due-process-does-not-require-right-to-counsel-in-early-stages-of-truancy-proceedings/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/09/wa-supreme-court-due-process-does-not-require-right-to-counsel-in-early-stages-of-truancy-proceedings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

