<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Brown v. EMM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-brown-v-emm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Video Game trade groups seek attorney&#8217;s fees in Supreme Court case versus California</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/video-game-trade-groups-seek-attorneys-fees-in-supreme-court-case-versus-california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/video-game-trade-groups-seek-attorneys-fees-in-supreme-court-case-versus-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Brown v. EMM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=109102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/07/a-rare-request-for-fees/">SCOTUSblog</a>: In a highly unusual plea in the Supreme Court, the two trade groups for the video game industry asked the Justices on Monday to require the state of California to reimburse industry lawyers for $1,144,602.24 (a figure that may later be increased) for legal fees and expenses — the professional costs of winning a major First Amendment victory in the Court. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/video-game-trade-groups-seek-attorneys-fees-in-supreme-court-case-versus-california/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/26/video-game-trade-groups-seek-attorneys-fees-in-supreme-court-case-versus-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

