<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Brown v. EMO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-brown-v-emo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stanley Fish: What Does the First Amendment Protect?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/07/stanley-fish-what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/07/stanley-fish-what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Brown v. EMO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanley Fish at the <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/04/what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/?hp">NYTimes.com</a>: And there you have it: a clash between the worship of freedom of speech and a concern for the quality of public life in relation to which free speech may sometimes be asked to take a back seat. It is the same clash that pits the freedom to play video games against society’s interest in fostering a generation of young adults responsive to its ideals and aspirations. We have seen this before — in the pornography cases, in the crush-video case, in the case upholding the right of an anti-gay ministry to picket the funerals of soldiers — and we shall certainly see it again. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/07/stanley-fish-what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/07/stanley-fish-what-does-the-first-amendment-protect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terence P. Jeffrey: Scalia&#8217;s Stupid Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/terence-p-jeffrey-scalias-stupid-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/terence-p-jeffrey-scalias-stupid-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obscenity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Brown v. EMO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terence P. Jeffrey at <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/terryjeffrey/2011/07/06/scalias_stupid_decision">Townhall</a>: "The practice and beliefs of the founding generation establish that 'the freedom of speech,' as originally understood, does not include a right to speak to minors (or a right of minors to access speech) without going through the minors' parents or guardians," wrote Thomas. But Thomas was a dissenter. Justice Antonin Scalia -- a conservative -- wrote the majority opinion in <em>Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association</em>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/terence-p-jeffrey-scalias-stupid-decision/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/terence-p-jeffrey-scalias-stupid-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hadley Arkes: That’s Entertainment: Free Speech and the Moral Regulation of the Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/hadley-arkes-that%e2%80%99s-entertainment-free-speech-and-the-moral-regulation-of-the-arts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/hadley-arkes-that%e2%80%99s-entertainment-free-speech-and-the-moral-regulation-of-the-arts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 06:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obscenity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Brown v. EMO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent Supreme Court case reveals a division amongst conservatives over the moral foundations of the law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/hadley-arkes-that%e2%80%99s-entertainment-free-speech-and-the-moral-regulation-of-the-arts/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/hadley-arkes-that%e2%80%99s-entertainment-free-speech-and-the-moral-regulation-of-the-arts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scalia and Thomas disagree about children and free speech</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/scalia-and-thomas-disagree-about-children-and-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/scalia-and-thomas-disagree-about-children-and-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Brown v. EMO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dissenting in a free-speech ruling about violent video games, Justice Clarence Thomas said the First Amendment was written at a time when parents were understood to exercise complete control over minor children. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/scalia-and-thomas-disagree-about-children-and-free-speech/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/scalia-and-thomas-disagree-about-children-and-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>67% Say States Should Be Able to Prohibit Sale of Violent Video Games to Children</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/67-say-states-should-be-able-to-prohibit-sale-of-violent-video-games-to-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/67-say-states-should-be-able-to-prohibit-sale-of-violent-video-games-to-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Brown v. EMO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/june_2011/67_say_states_should_be_able_to_prohibit_sale_of_violent_video_games_to_children">Rasmussen Reports</a>: A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that two-out-of-three American Adults (67%) believe states should be allowed to prohibit the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. Just 28% disagree. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/67-say-states-should-be-able-to-prohibit-sale-of-violent-video-games-to-children/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/67-say-states-should-be-able-to-prohibit-sale-of-violent-video-games-to-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phyllis Schlafly: Court Wraps Video Games in First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/phyllis-schlafly-court-wraps-video-games-in-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/phyllis-schlafly-court-wraps-video-games-in-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Brown v. EMO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phyllis Schlafly at <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/phyllisschlafly/2011/07/05/court_wraps_video_games_in_first_amendment">Townhall </a>: The U.S. Supreme Court got it wrong in Brown v. Entertainment Merchant Association. This wasn't a First Amendment case, it was a parents' rights case -- and only Justice Clarence Thomas understood that. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/phyllis-schlafly-court-wraps-video-games-in-first-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/05/phyllis-schlafly-court-wraps-video-games-in-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

