<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Camreta and Alford v. Greene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-camreta-and-alford-v-greene/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court confronts conflict between constitutional rights and protecting children</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/28/supreme-court-confronts-conflict-between-constitutional-rights-and-protecting-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/28/supreme-court-confronts-conflict-between-constitutional-rights-and-protecting-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Camreta and Alford v. Greene]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=96692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/27/AR2011022702969.html">Washington Post</a>: But the other side of the question is represented by 18 amicus briefs joined by 70 groups across the political spectrum arguing that the 9th Circuit should be upheld. The case raises important questions about parental rights and the rights of children, they said. "The fact that the seized person here was a 9-year old girl requires, as a matter of constitutional law, more vigilance about protecting individual liberty from state abuse," the Center for Individual Rights said in its brief. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/28/supreme-court-confronts-conflict-between-constitutional-rights-and-protecting-children/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/28/supreme-court-confronts-conflict-between-constitutional-rights-and-protecting-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phyllis Schlafly: Gov&#8217;t trampling on constitutional rights of parents</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/02/phyllis-schlafly-govt-trampling-on-constitutional-rights-of-parents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/02/phyllis-schlafly-govt-trampling-on-constitutional-rights-of-parents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Protective Services (CPS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Camreta and Alford v. Greene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Los Angeles County v. Humphries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=79765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phyllis Schlafly <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/PhyllisSchlafly/2010/11/02/government_trampling_on_constitutional_rights_of_parents/page/full/">writing at Townhall</a>: "A new study casts doubt on the value of CPS. . . The researchers concluded that CPS's intervention did little or nothing to improve the lives of the children . . . Two cases involving Child Protective Services are now before the U.S. Supreme Court . . . <em>Camreta and Alford v. Greene</em>." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/02/phyllis-schlafly-govt-trampling-on-constitutional-rights-of-parents/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/02/phyllis-schlafly-govt-trampling-on-constitutional-rights-of-parents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

