The President vs. The Senate: Supreme Court to weigh in on Obama’s nominations power play

    David Rivkin and Lee Casey at Wall Street Journal (via Google): Later this month the Supreme Court will hear a case that should resolve how much latitude presidents have to make recess appointments to federal offices that otherwise require Senate confirmation. The boundary of this power has never been decided by the high court. Yet the entire scheme of the U.S. Constitution—which is based on a separation of powers, enforced through checks and balances to safeguard individual liberty—is at stake. Noel Canning v. NLRB involves several recess appointments President Obama made to the National Labor Relations Board on Jan. 4, 2012.


  • Posted: 01/03/2014
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar

  • Tags: , , , ,

SCOTUS ponders whether the president can make appointments while Congress is out

Senate GOP Could Taste Sweet Revenge In Supreme Court Case

Senate Republicans Get Argument Time in Recess Case

Originalist Scholars Amicus Brief in NLRB v. Noel Canning

In new term, Supreme Court may steer to right on key social issues

11 Supreme Court Cases That Could Change The U.S. In The Coming Year

Will the filibuster deal moot Noel Canning?

Were Obama recess appointments constitutional? Supreme Court takes case

High Court To Hear Obama Recess Appointments Case

Obama asks SCOTUS to review recess appointments ruling

House committee debates bill to pause NLRB

Obama nominates new NLRB members as House threatens to halt board actions

Obama Recess Picks Meet Skepticism From Appeals Judges

NRLB Skips En Banc Review of Recess Appointments Case; Heads Straight for Supremes

Senate GOP introduces bill to cut salaries of NLRB members

Spreading challenge to appointment power

Obama NLRB Recess Appointments Unlawful, D.C. Circuit Says