<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Cooke v. Tubra</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-cooke-v-tubra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>High court nixes church appeal in defamation case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/28/high-court-nixes-church-appeal-in-defamation-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/28/high-court-nixes-church-appeal-in-defamation-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Church Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cooke v. Tubra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=96724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/national/1110ap_us_supreme_court_pastor_defamation.html">Seattle PI</a>: "The Supreme Court has refused to toss out a defamation award to a fired pastor, despite claims by the church that dismissed him that its actions are protected by the Constitution's religious freedom guarantees." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/28/high-court-nixes-church-appeal-in-defamation-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/28/high-court-nixes-church-appeal-in-defamation-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Religion Cases at the Supreme Court’s Conference Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/interesting-religion-cases-at-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-conference-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/interesting-religion-cases-at-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-conference-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cooke v. Tubra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hosanna Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=96445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Elwood writes at the Volokh Conspiracy: "Cooke v. Tubra, 10–559 . . .  presents the question whether the First Amendment bars a pastor’s defamation claim against the church that employed him when the claim is based entirely on statements made by church officials   . . . In addition, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v EEOC, 10–553, involves whether the judicially recognized “ministerial exception” to the Americans with Disabilities Act, bars review of the termination of a parochial school teacher who teaches the full secular curriculum, but also teaches daily religion classes . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/interesting-religion-cases-at-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-conference-tomorrow/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/24/interesting-religion-cases-at-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-conference-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damaging words cost pastor his pulpit but land him big bucks</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/02/damaging-words-cost-pastor-his-pulpit-but-land-him-big-bucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/02/damaging-words-cost-pastor-his-pulpit-but-land-him-big-bucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cooke v. Tubra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=79878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/first_amendment_rites/">The ABA Journal</a>: "A jury agreed and awarded Tubra $355,000 in damages after it found officials falsely accused him of stealing from the International Church of the Foursquare Gospel in Vernonia, Ore.The judge differed with the jurors, though, and threw out the award. Following overwhelming precedent, he ruled that the First Amendment deprived the court of jurisdiction over the church and Tubra’s defamation claim against it." John Elwood comments at the <a href="http://volokh.com/2010/11/02/interesting-free-exercise-clause-petition">Volokh Conspiracy</a> on <em>Cook v. Tubra</em>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/02/damaging-words-cost-pastor-his-pulpit-but-land-him-big-bucks/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/02/damaging-words-cost-pastor-his-pulpit-but-land-him-big-bucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court review sought in pastor&#8217;s defamation claim against church</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/25/supreme-court-review-sought-in-pastors-defamation-claim-against-church/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/25/supreme-court-review-sought-in-pastors-defamation-claim-against-church/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Church Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Cooke v. Tubra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=78224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/10/supreme-court-review-sought-in-pastors.html">Religion Clause</a>: "On Friday, a petition for certiorari (<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/40033959/Tubra-Cert-Petition-10-22-10">full text</a>) to the U.S. Supreme Court was filed in <em>Cooke v. Tubra</em>. In the case, an Oregon state appellate court held that jurisdiction over an interim pastor's defamation claim against his former church and two of its officers is not necessarily barred by the First Amendment." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/25/supreme-court-review-sought-in-pastors-defamation-claim-against-church/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/25/supreme-court-review-sought-in-pastors-defamation-claim-against-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

