<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-davenport-v-american-atheists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court steers clear of roadside crosses &#124; The Baptist Standard</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/14/supreme-court-steers-clear-of-roadside-crosses-the-baptist-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/14/supreme-court-steers-clear-of-roadside-crosses-the-baptist-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Byron Babione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=118451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.baptiststandard.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=13199&#038;Itemid=53">The Baptist Standard (Religion News Service)</a>: The conservative Alliance Defense Fund, which asked the Supreme Court to consider the case, was disappointed. "Justice is not well served when unhappy atheists can use the law to mow down memorial crosses and renew the suffering for the survivors," Alliance Defense Fund Senior Counsel Byron Babione said. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/14/supreme-court-steers-clear-of-roadside-crosses-the-baptist-standard/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/14/supreme-court-steers-clear-of-roadside-crosses-the-baptist-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Thomas spanks court on religious displays</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/07/under-the-u-s-supreme-court-thomas-spanks-court-on-religious-displays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/07/under-the-u-s-supreme-court-thomas-spanks-court-on-religious-displays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/11/06/Under-the-US-Supreme-Court-Thomas-spanks-court-on-religious-displays/UPI-80331320575400/?spt=hs&#038;or=tn">UPI.com</a>: The U.S. Supreme Court turned its collective face from two linked cases last week, rejecting them without comment other than a blistering dissent from Justice Clarence Thomas, who caustically told the rest of the justices their guidance in religious display cases was a mess. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/07/under-the-u-s-supreme-court-thomas-spanks-court-on-religious-displays/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/07/under-the-u-s-supreme-court-thomas-spanks-court-on-religious-displays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linda Greenhouse: Not Following Clarence Thomas: The incoherent landscape of the court&#8217;s Establishment Clause jurisprudence</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/03/linda-greenhouse-not-following-clarence-thomas-the-incoherent-landscape-of-the-courts-establishment-clause-jurisprudence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/03/linda-greenhouse-not-following-clarence-thomas-the-incoherent-landscape-of-the-courts-establishment-clause-jurisprudence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Linda Greenhouse at <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/02/leading-from-behind/">NYTimes.com</a>: The dissent was a vivid tour through the incoherent landscape of the court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence. Here are a few choice morsels, omitting the numerous citations not only to Supreme Court decisions but also to decisions issued by lower courts as they have struggled to understand and apply the Supreme Court’s cases . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/03/linda-greenhouse-not-following-clarence-thomas-the-incoherent-landscape-of-the-courts-establishment-clause-jurisprudence/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/03/linda-greenhouse-not-following-clarence-thomas-the-incoherent-landscape-of-the-courts-establishment-clause-jurisprudence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David L. Hudson: &#8220;Clarence Thomas: Court needs to ‘clean up our mess’&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/david-l-hudson-clarence-thomas-court-needs-to-%e2%80%98clean-up-our-mess%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/david-l-hudson-clarence-thomas-court-needs-to-%e2%80%98clean-up-our-mess%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David L. Hudson at <a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/clarence-thomas-court-needs-to-%E2%80%98clean-up-our-mess%E2%80%99">First Amendment Center</a>: One may believe that Justice Thomas is an outlier with his establishment-clause position. But his latest dissent hits the mark when he identifies that the Court is inconsistent when fielding church-state separation questions. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/david-l-hudson-clarence-thomas-court-needs-to-%e2%80%98clean-up-our-mess%e2%80%99/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/david-l-hudson-clarence-thomas-court-needs-to-%e2%80%98clean-up-our-mess%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court Cross Decision: Missed Opportunity&#8221; &#124; Christianity Today</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/clarence-thomas-on-the-supreme-court-cross-decision-missed-opportunity-christianity-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/clarence-thomas-on-the-supreme-court-cross-decision-missed-opportunity-christianity-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Byron Babione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctliveblog/archives/2011/11/clarence_thomas.html">Christianity Today</a>: The Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) attorney Byron Babione said, “The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear this case is baffling in light of its comments just last year that individualized memorial crosses honoring fallen troopers do not amount to a government establishment of religion.” Babione and the ADF helped represent those who paid for and maintained the crosses . . . According to the <a href="http://oldsite.alliancedefensefund.org/userdocs/UHPA-CertPetition.pdf">ADF's brief</a>, that the crosses were memorials and symbols of sacrifice; they did not represent Christianity. "The [Utah Highway Patrol Association] chose the cross shape because it is the only symbol, given its historical use, that could simultaneously communicate messages of roadside death, commemoration, and highway safety," the ADF brief said. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/clarence-thomas-on-the-supreme-court-cross-decision-missed-opportunity-christianity-today/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/02/clarence-thomas-on-the-supreme-court-cross-decision-missed-opportunity-christianity-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No clarity on religious displays &#124; SCOTUSblog</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/01/no-clarity-on-religious-displays-scotusblog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/01/no-clarity-on-religious-displays-scotusblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent years, five of the Supreme Court Justices have been highly critical of how the Court decides the constitutionality of public displays of religious symbols or messages. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/01/no-clarity-on-religious-displays-scotusblog/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/01/no-clarity-on-religious-displays-scotusblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FRC Blasts Supreme Court for Allowing Decision to Stand that Removes Roadside Crosses in Six States</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/31/frc-blasts-supreme-court-for-allowing-decision-to-stand-that-removes-roadside-crosses-in-six-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/31/frc-blasts-supreme-court-for-allowing-decision-to-stand-that-removes-roadside-crosses-in-six-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 10th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.frc.org/newsroom/frc-blasts-supreme-court-for-allowing-decision-to-stand-that-removes-roadside-crosses-in-six-states">FRC</a>: Family Research Council (FRC) strongly criticized the U.S. Supreme Court's decision today to let stand one of the worst religious assaults in all of American history. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/31/frc-blasts-supreme-court-for-allowing-decision-to-stand-that-removes-roadside-crosses-in-six-states/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/31/frc-blasts-supreme-court-for-allowing-decision-to-stand-that-removes-roadside-crosses-in-six-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS for law students: Free speech and religious freedom intersect in case of Utah crosses</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/25/scotus-for-law-students-free-speech-and-religious-freedom-intersect-in-case-of-utah-crosses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/25/scotus-for-law-students-free-speech-and-religious-freedom-intersect-in-case-of-utah-crosses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Pleasant Grove v. Summum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Salazar v Buono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Utah Highway Patrol Association v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=116667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, it seems, a case may confound the Supreme Court:  should it grant certiorari to hear oral argument and decide the question presented by the case, should it deny review even though the case presents important questions, should it rule summarily, without hearing oral arguments, or should it instead hold the case for a related one? <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/25/scotus-for-law-students-free-speech-and-religious-freedom-intersect-in-case-of-utah-crosses/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/25/scotus-for-law-students-free-speech-and-religious-freedom-intersect-in-case-of-utah-crosses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS Petitions to watch October 7, 2011: Two key Establishment Clauses relisted</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/10/scotus-petitions-to-watch-october-7-2011-two-key-establishment-clauses-relisted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/10/scotus-petitions-to-watch-october-7-2011-two-key-establishment-clauses-relisted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Utah Highway Patrol Association v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=115783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/10/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-october-7-2011/#more-129330">SCOTUSblog</a> list is here. It includes two key Establishment cases: <em>Davenport v. American Atheists</em> and <em>Utah Highway patrol Association v. American Atheists</em> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/10/scotus-petitions-to-watch-october-7-2011-two-key-establishment-clauses-relisted/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/10/scotus-petitions-to-watch-october-7-2011-two-key-establishment-clauses-relisted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS Blog Petitions of the Day: Do highway memorial crosses violate the Establishment Clause</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/scotus-blog-petitions-of-the-day-do-highway-memorial-crosses-violate-the-establishment-clause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/scotus-blog-petitions-of-the-day-do-highway-memorial-crosses-violate-the-establishment-clause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: American Atheists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Utah Highway Patrol Association v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=107577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/07/petition-of-the-day-136/">SCOTUSblog</a> features the petitions for <em>certiorari</em> in <em>Utah Highway Patrol Association v. American Atheists</em> and <em>Davenport v. American Atheists, Inc.</em>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/scotus-blog-petitions-of-the-day-do-highway-memorial-crosses-violate-the-establishment-clause/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/06/scotus-blog-petitions-of-the-day-do-highway-memorial-crosses-violate-the-establishment-clause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FRC to Mobilize Coalition Effort in U.S. Supreme Court Religious Liberty Case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/21/frc-to-mobilize-coalition-effort-in-u-s-supreme-court-religious-liberty-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/21/frc-to-mobilize-coalition-effort-in-u-s-supreme-court-religious-liberty-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Davenport v. American Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=101643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.frc.org/pressrelease/frc-to-mobilize-coalition-effort-in-us-supreme-court-religious-liberty-case">FRC</a>: Family Research Council announced today that the organization is coordinating a nationwide support effort for the State of Utah in the case <em>Davenport v. American Atheists</em>, one of the most important religious liberty cases to be offered to the U.S. Supreme Court in decades . . . The Utah Highway Patrol Association is represented separately by the Alliance Defense Fund.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/21/frc-to-mobilize-coalition-effort-in-u-s-supreme-court-religious-liberty-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/21/frc-to-mobilize-coalition-effort-in-u-s-supreme-court-religious-liberty-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

