World: “It’s outrageous for pastors and churches to be threatened or punished by the government for applying biblical teachings to all areas of life, including candidates and elections,” ADF legal counsel Erik Stanley told Focus on the Family’s Citizen Link last month. He added that the purpose of the October event was “to make sure that the pastor, and not the IRS, decides what is said from the pulpit.”
- Posted: 11/19/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.worldmag.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Pulpit Freedom Sunday, ADF: Pulpit Initiative, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Taxation, ZZ: Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Shulman
Nick Vadala at The Philly Post: Headed up by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian group out of Arizona, the stunt essentially makes a mockery out of the IRS’s code enforcement. Most endorsements, unsurprisingly, go to Romney or Republicans generally, but that’s beside the point. Endorsement on either side is simply against the law . . . Erik Stanley of the ADF told the Washington Times that the FFRF’s lawsuit “borders on frivolous” and that it probably will go nowhere in court. There’s also very little chance that the FFRF will be able to prove they’ve been done damage by the IRS’s un-enforcement of the Johnson Amendment. But even if they could, as much as I hate to say it, he’s right about the lawsuit missing the mark . . . All I hear when pastors endorse Romney (or Obama, or Jill Stein, or whoever) is “charge us, we would like to contribute to the society that pays our way.” Let the ADF think they’re freedom fighters for the religious set; it’ll cost them eventually.
- Posted: 11/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blogs.phillymag.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Pulpit Freedom Sunday, ADF: Pulpit Initiative, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Taxation, ZZ: Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Shulman
Tennessean: The preachers and their allies at Alliance Defending Freedom, a Scottsdale, Arizona-based Christian legal group, say the ban is unconstitutional. More than 1,000 preachers nationwide endorsed candidates in this year’s Pulpit Freedom Sunday, in hopes of prompting IRS investigations. So far the IRS has not responded. Now those preachers may have their day in court, with help from an unlikely source – the Freedom from Religion Foundation.
- Posted: 11/16/2012
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: blogs.tennessean.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Pulpit Freedom Sunday, ADF: Pulpit Initiative, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Taxation, ZZ: Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Shulman
God Discussion Blog: For the past few years, religious right groups have been encouraging pastors to endorse candidates and political matters from the pulpit during “Pulpit Freedom Sunday.” The effort has been spearheaded by the Christian advocacy group, Alliance Defending Freedom (formerly known as the Alliance Defense Fund) and actively promoted by groups such as Liberty Counsel. At least 1,500 pastors reportedly participated in “Pulpit Freedom Sunday” this year, on October 7.
- Posted: 11/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.goddiscussion.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Pulpit Freedom Sunday, ADF: Pulpit Initiative, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Taxation, ZZ: Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Shulman
Washington Times: “I think the lawsuit itself really borders on frivolous. I don’t know how the FFRF can claim they’ve been harmed by the IRS‘ refusal to enforce the Johnson Amendment,” Mr. Stanley said. “But, on the chance it does, then we will seek to protect those churches.”
- Posted: 11/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.washingtontimes.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Pulpit Freedom Sunday, ADF: Pulpit Initiative, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Taxation, ZZ: Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Shulman
One News Now: “Well, I think this is just further evidence that groups like Freedom From Religion Foundation or Americans United for Separation of Church and State are trying to use the Johnson Amendment in the tax code as a tool of intimidation to silence and censor churches,” contends Erik Stanley, senior counsel with the Alliance Defending Freedom.
- Posted: 11/15/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Pulpit Freedom Sunday, ADF: Pulpit Initiative, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, State: Wisconsin, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Taxation, ZZ: Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Shulman
AP: The lawsuit also refers to “Pulpit Freedom Sunday,” a national event on Oct. 7 in which more than 1,500 pastors endorsed a candidate from the pulpit and then sent a record of their statement to the IRS, hoping their challenge would eventually end up in court. The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal organization based in Scottsdale, Ariz., has organized the event since 2008. The group considers the IRS regulations against bringing partisan politics to the pulpit an unconstitutional government intrusion.
- Posted: 11/15/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: hosted.ap.org
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Pulpit Freedom Sunday, ADF: Pulpit Initiative, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, State: Wisconsin, Topic: Church Sovereignty, Topic: Taxation, ZZ: Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Shulman
|

Latest Posts
-
05/21/2013
Jeremy Tedesco appeared on the Zeb Bell Show to discuss this: Benefits Restored To Montana’s Disabled Children Of Faith. | MP3 audio 10:34 mins
-
www.christianexaminer.com
05/21/2013
Michael Foust of Baptist Press at Christian Examiner: The ADF countersuit says forcing Stutsman to service a gay wedding violates her rights under Washington’s constitution, which ADF says “has broader protections for conscience and religious freedom” than does the U.S. Constitution. “The Washington State Constitution, in Article 1, Section 11, absolutely protects ‘freedom of conscience in all matters of religious sentiment, belief, and worship’ and guarantees that ‘no one shall be molested or disturbed in person or property on account of religion,’” the countersuit says.
-
05/21/2013
Paul Coleman at the Christian Post: The United Kingdom’s multitude of “equality” provisions will protect nearly anyone born with a disability, although it is perfectly legal to prevent disabled people from being born, up to the point of birth (simply because they have a disability). The U.K.’s abortion law is therefore an example of the most blatant and basic form of discrimination imaginable.

|