Comments on: Live Commentary: California Marriage Cases Supreme Court Argument

By: michaelsochacki

michaelsochacki — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:31:16 +0000

I want to encouirage you to keep on Standing up for the Truth and His Word even in Marriage.

By: John

John — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:06:07 +0000

Kudos to the ADF bloggers for their streaming summary of the arguments. I was only able to watch and hear (and that with some difficulty) the last half of the three-plus hours of oral argument. The blog summaries are very helpful.

I wrote an amici brief for the Calif. Supreme Court in the consolidated marriage cases on behalf of three organizations that include ex-gays. If homosexuality is an immutable characteristic, then my clients must be non-exist. Their existence refutes the “immutable characteristic” argument. Plus, sexual orientation is by declaration–there is no way of testing for it. Its a thin veneer to cover up millenia of traditional marriages.

The ultimate issue is this–who defines marriage in California–the people, or the court?

By: Daniel

Daniel — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:22:51 +0000

I don’t know if you’ve always provided a live commentary to oral arguments, but this is fantastic! I’m in the law school library and I’m so glued to the computer screen, passersby would probably assume I’m watching highlights from last night’s Mavs-Jazz game.

Good stuff! Thanks!