Why regulate marriage at all? Glen Lavy of ADF v. Lambda Legal Attorney



The LA Times continues its point, counter-point series between Glen Lavy of ADF and Lambda Legal Attorney Jon W. Davidson.  Today’s topic:

Jon W. Davidson says the state has a compelling legal interest in regulating marriage and fully including same-sex couples. Glen Lavy agrees that marriage ought to be regulated, but argues that the state has ample reasons not to include homosexuals.



Comments

Your email address is never published nor shared. Comments should be relevant, respectful, informative, and insightful. Opinions should be supported by appropriate analysis. All comments are moderated and will not appear online until approved by a moderator. Inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted without explanation. Required fields are marked *

*
*