EurActiv: “300 objectors have filed a lawsuit against the Spanish government’s “leftist stance” on education, challenging compulsory ‘anti-Christian’ classes for school students before the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) . . . The suit, filed this month by lawyers from the Alliance Defence Fund (ADF) and Professionals for Ethics, calls for the adoption of ‘provisional measures’ preventing the Spanish government from obliging children to sit the course.”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.euractiv.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Global, Country: Spain, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, Topic: Parental Rights
WorldNetDailya: “A lawsuit has been filed against the Spanish government over mandatory classes that expose children to sexually explicit images and bash Christian beliefs . . . ‘Americans should take note of this case because this sort of situation is not restricted to Spain,’ said [Roger Kiska], legal counsel for ADF based in Europe. ‘Many parents would be dismayed to know that there are organizations in the U.S. that have attempted to persuade school districts to use similar types of curriculum.’”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Global, Country: Spain, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, Topic: Parental Rights
Las Vegas Sun: “The American Civil Liberties Union, on behalf of Davis and two newspapers, today asked the full U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to rehear the case and overturn a decision by a three-judge panel of the court upholding the state’s ban on prostitution ads. ACLU lawyer Allen Lichtenstein wrote in his petition: ‘Because brothels are licensed in Nevada, commercial speech concerning them is constitutionally protected.’” | See full post for related items.
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.lasvegassun.com
- Tags: Court: 9th Circuit, Topic: Pornography, ZZ: Coyote Publishing Inc v Miller
Student Press Law Center: “Lawyers for The Liberty, an independent publication at Oregon State University, filed a motion for reconsideration after a judge ruled in favor of the university in a lawsuit filed by the paper . . . Though lawyers for the Liberty filed a motion for immediate relief, which would have required the university to allow the newspaper to again be distributed on campus, it was withdrawn after the university amended its fixed bin policy and allowed the paper to distribute again, said [Heather Gebelin Hacker], an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund representing the Liberty.”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.splc.org
- Tags: ADF: Center for Academic Freedom, ADF: Heather Gebelin Hacker, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, State: Oregon, Topic: Education, ZZ: Oregon State University Students Alliance v Ray
Gary Palmer and Harold See write at the Alabama Policy Institute: “This past week, Congress passed a health care act that both supporters and opponents say will put control of important aspects of our lives in the hands of the federal government. It is a mistake to think the uproar is merely about a health care act. Congress has diminished the states, making them in many ways mere instruments of its will, diminishing local freedom to experiment, and producing near fiscal bankruptcy, both to the states and the nation. At least 36 states have introduced legislation against the implementation of the act. These actions, known as nullification, fail to address the major problem and have limited chance of success. Nullification is designed to persuade Congress to alter its action; this Congress appears immune to persuasion. Other states have sued, claiming that the act is unconstitutional. These efforts will likely be futile because of the federal courts’ expansive reading of federal power. Even if they are successful, repealing one act does little to address Congress’s habitual overreaching . . . Patrick Henry wrote, ‘If there be a real check intended to be left on Congress, it must be left in the State Governments.’ A state-initiated constitutional amendment, backed by grassroots support, should be directed at restraining the abuses of the national government, thereby restoring the kind of self government intended by the Constitution.
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.alabamapolicy.org
- Tags: Group: Alabama Policy Institute
Mark Steyn has this commentary in the Orange County Register discussing hidden taxes in “health care” reform and the possibility of a forthcoming VAT tax. He concludes: “Which is to say that right now the future lies somewhere between the certainty of decline and the probability of catastrophe. What can stop it? Not a lot. But now that your ‘pro-life’ Democratic congressman has sold out, you might want to quit calling Washington and try your state capital. If the Commerce Clause can legitimize the ‘individual mandate,’ then there is no republic, not in any meaningful sense. If you don’t like the sound of that, maybe it’s time for a constitutional convention.”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.ocregister.com
- Tags: Topic: Economy, Topic: Insurance, Topic: Legislation
Wall Street Journal: “AT&T Inc. plans to take a noncash $1 billion charge in the first quarter in anticipating the impact of changes brought by the nation’s health-care overhaul. The Dallas-based telecommunications giant is the latest—and largest—company to take a charge to account for the increased costs under the new health-care plan . . . ”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Topic: Economy, Topic: Insurance
The Obama Administration and International Law
Harold Hongju Koh
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State
Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law
Washington, DC
March 25, 2010
Since this is my first chance to address you as Legal Adviser, I thought I would speak to three issues. First, the nature of my job as Legal Adviser. Second, to discuss the strategic vision of international law that we in the Obama Administration are attempting to implement. Third and finally, to discuss particular issues that we have grappled with in our first year in a number of high-profile areas: the International Criminal Court, the Human Rights Council, and what I call The Law of 9/11: detentions, use of force, and prosecutions . . .
Some, including a number of the panelists who have addressed this conference, have argued that there is really more Continuity than Change from the last administration to this one.
To them I would answer that, of course, in foreign policy, from administration to administration, there will always be more continuity than change; you simply cannot turn the ship of state 360 degrees from administration to administration every four to eight years, nor should you. But, I would argue—and these are the core of my remarks today– to say that is to understate the most important difference between this administration and the last: and that is with respect to its approach and attitude toward international law. The difference in that approach to international law I would argue is captured in an Emerging “Obama-Clinton Doctrine,” which is based on four commitments: to: 1. Principled Engagement; 2. Diplomacy as a Critical Element of Smart Power; 3. Strategic Multilateralism; and 4. the notion that Living Our Values Makes us Stronger and Safer, by Following Rules of Domestic and International Law; and Following Universal Standards, Not Double Standards . . . [click the link to read more]
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Bench and Bar
- |
- Source: www.state.gov
- Tags: Category: Global, Global: Bench and Bar, Topic: International Law, Topic: White House
CNET: Workers at Internet network operation centers around the world are trying to figure out why traffic to sites such as YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook was redirected to servers in China this week, giving Web surfers around the globe a glimpse of what Chinese Internet users see when they try to access those blocked sites . . . ‘This was a real world example of the Net security industry’s worst nightmare,’ he said. ‘And last night it happened.’ . . . ‘The wider problems are that it appears that someone in China can disrupt Facebook for someone in California,’ he said. ‘It appears we can no longer see the Internet as a friendly shared resource and that strict boundaries will have to be put in place. The problem is the technology is not really there to make that happen.’”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: news.cnet.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: China, Global: Miscellaneous, Topic: Internet
Patrick J. Buchanan writes at Townhall: “Each new report of settlement expansion, each new seizure of Palestinian property, each new West Bank clash between Palestinians and Israeli troops inflames the Arab street, humiliates our Arab allies, exposes America as a weakling that cannot stand up to Israel, and imperils our troops and their mission in Afghanistan and Iraq. As this message has now been delivered by Gen. Petraeus to his commander in chief, Obama simply cannot back down again . . . ”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Country: Israel, Topic: Military, Topic: White House
Gilbert Watch: “[The Code] was interpreted by an intelligence who . . . resorted to ‘his best professional judgment’ to rule that a ‘small scale religious assembly’ described seven adults in the private home of a pastor. Therefore, the administrator reasoned, the church meetings could not be held in the home. This Zoning Intepretation, written by Senior Planner/Zoning Administrator, cost Pastor Sutherland $305, payable to the Town of Gilbert . . . on 3/10/2010, the 10-page Appeal from the Alliance Defense Fund’s attorneys was hand-carried and faxed to the Town of Gilbert’s Board of Adjustment. Did the Council know about this Appeal? Did anyone act on it? No. Not until the Media contacted the Council on 3/12/2010 did anyone at the Town act. Now, under the glaring lights of the media spotlight, the Council took action.”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: gilbertwatch.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Arizona, Topic: RLUIPA
ADF Attorney Matt Bowman writing in The Washington Examiner: “Cathy DeCarlo of Brooklyn and her family followed the health reform debate more closely than some others might have. Cathy is Catholic and a nurse at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. Less than a year ago, the federally-funded hospital forced her to assist in a 22-week dismemberment abortion, despite her tearful pleas that she be spared the horror. President Obama’s health reform executive order on abortion claims to protect the conscience rights of pro-life health providers like Cathy. But on closer reading, the order proves to be yet another presidential action that makes every pro-life health care provider a potential ‘next Cathy DeCarlo.’”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.washingtonexaminer.com
- Tags: ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Congress, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Insurance, Topic: White House, ZZ: Cenzon-DeCarlo v The Mount Sinai Hospital
AP: “Some groups have held events throughout the month, although Black Marriage Day, which celebrates matrimony in the black community, falls on the fourth Sunday in March. The founder estimates more than 300 celebrations are being held this weekend. The aim is to try to stabilize, if not reverse, the trend of non-commitment within the black community. Studies show blacks are less likely to marry than other ethnic groups and more likely to divorce and bear children out of wedlock.”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.washingtonpost.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Culture, Topic: Marriage
The state Supreme Court, Lash wrote, has described a ‘fundamental right’ as ‘”inherent in man’s nature,” among the “basic rights of human beings,” and among the “Hallmarks of Western Civilization.”‘ The argument that a same-sex marriage passes such a test is ‘unsupportable,’ the judge continued.” [post update links to the opinion]
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: Pennsylvania, Topic: Culture, Topic: Divorce, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Kern v. Taney
“President Obama’s fiscal 2011 budget will generate nearly $10 trillion in cumulative budget deficits over the next 10 years, $1.2 trillion more than the administration projected, and raise the federal debt to 90 percent of the nation’s economic output by 2020, the Congressional Budget Office reported Thursday.”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.washingtontimes.com
- Tags: Topic: Economics, Topic: White House
Joshua E. Perry and Jeffrey P. Bishop, Life, Death (Panels), and the Body Politic (March 25, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1578344
“In this timely and provocative essay, the authors argue that concerns about government intervention at the end-of-life in the form of ‘death panels’ articulated by those on the political right is at the same time both nonsensical and natural, given the overt politicization of life and death in the United States. The irony, of course, is that it was the political right that most recently and dramatically fueled the government intervention in the case of Terri Schiavo. The unfortunate consequence of such governmental and political encroachment into life – no longer a bioethics, but a biopolitics – is that the intensely private moment of our death, when we are supposed to be surrounded by our friends and family, has become increasingly difficult – and susceptible to the sort of government intervention lampooned by the ‘death panel’ discussion.”
- Posted: 03/26/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Euthanasia, Topic: Insurance, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|
|