Canada: PM Harper mulled forcing support for pro-abort motion

GOP Senators Delay Vote on Liu

Irish Civil Partnership Bill is “direct attack” on conscience

GA: Seven school districts sue state over local control of charter schools

UK: Families hit by average of £45 a week “couple penalty”

Mosque going up in NYC building damaged on 9/11

Albert Mohler: It’s Getting Dangerous Out There — A Preacher Is Arrested in Britain

Barry Lynn and Eric Buehrer debate the National Day of Prayer on the Michael Medved Show

FL: Crist Hinting At Possible Veto Of Anti-Abortion Bill

TX: Police raid home adult sex business near west-side elementary school

Atheists call on Tampa City Council to halt public prayer

Netherlands: 1200 churches expected to be sold in next 10 years

92 Percent of Americans Believe in God; Only 5 Percent Oppose National Day of Prayer

Duane Morris’ D.C. Office to House Global Development Center

Catholic hospital network files sale notice

IRD Calls on Churches to Condemn Iran’s Election to United Nations Commission on Women

Members Of Congress Propose Bill To Strip Citizenship From American Terrorism Suspects

    ACLU: “Senators Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) and Scott Brown (R-MA) and Congressmen Jason Altmire (D-PA) and Charlie Dent (R-PA)today introduced legislation that would strip American citizenship from Americans who have not been convicted of any crimes and are suspected of being involved with terrorism organizations. The bill would direct the State Department, which designates groups as terrorist organizations, to determine if a suspect is involved with or working for such an organization and whether or not to remove a suspect’s citizenship . . . ”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.aclu.org

  • Tags:

Settlement on the books: Fla. library allows religious seminar in meeting room

UNFPA Pushes Reproductive Rights in United Nations Treaties to Promote Abortion

State Wants to Close Philadelphia Center Where Woman Died in Botched Abortion

Religion not just personal affair in Russia, Moscow official says

    Eurasia Review: “Poll results released last week showing that 53 percent of Russians believe religion to be a personal matter’ . . . have prompted some unusual reactions in Moscow. Aleksandr Zhuravsky, the head of the department of the inter-ethnic relations of the Regional Development Ministry, told Nezavisimaya gazeta that these results reflect ‘a certain social paradigm which has been preserved in the consciousness of Russians from Soviet times.’ That paradigm holds, he continued, that ‘the social function of religious organizations is limited to the walls’ of the church, mosque or synagogue, and it is supported by ‘elderly citizens and citizens of middle age.’ But in his view, the situation now is different: ‘Religion is part of the spiritual culture and a socially active force,’ something protected by law.”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.eurasiareview.com

  • Tags: , , ,

Russian Orthodox: Europe allows freedom to criticise religions, but censors their voice in society

Iraq’s Shiites nearly form religious-based majority

US lawmakers publish internet privacy bill

    The Register: “A new law has been proposed that mandates information to be given to website visitors to improve privacy protections in the US. It also lists types of data that can be used until people opt out, and others that can be used only with their consent. The proposal (pdf) has been published by members of the House of Representatives, Rick Boucher and Cliff Stearns, who are on the House’s Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet. They claim it will offer better protection to users from the increased processing of data demanded by the growing use of behavioural advertising.”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.theregister.co.uk

  • Tags: ,

FL: Pasco Republicans call for inclusion of prayer at PHCC graduation

UC Irvine to open new stem-cell research center

Reversing Christian disappearance from the Middle East: Three legal proposals to consider

Hawaii governor “up in the air” on civil unions

Sunni-backed party in Iraq warns of sectarianism

Triple-X domain being considered – why it’s a bad idea

    AFA: “The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, ICANN, (the governing board that controls the Internet) is ONCE AGAIN considering establishing an .XXX domain for pornography. This matter has been considered twice before but stopped because of overwhelming opposition in this country and abroad. An .XXX domain will increase the amount of porn on the internet and make it more available to adults and children . . . Here are reasons to oppose the .XXX domain, from our friends at PornHarms.com . . .”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: archive.afa.net

  • Tags: , ,

New Gilbert code allows religious gatherings in private homes

Chuck Colson: Punishing religious beliefs

WA Supreme Court: Libraries can block internet porn

Suspended Tory candidate loses teaching job over comments on homosexual behavior

Churches, strip clubs are winners in Middle Smithfield

Judge hears arguments on federal marriage law

The Marbury myth

    Robert Lowry Clinton writing at National Review Online: “Thus, Marbury-style judicial review is very limited in scope. It is restricted to cases in which Congress has unconstitutionally meddled with the Court’s functions. This is surely why the case was largely ignored by courts and legal commentators as a precedent for judicial review until the late 19th century. The Court itself didn’t notice that Marbury had anything to do with judicial review until 1887, and even then it misread the case as authorizing judicial review of state law — which Marbury had nothing to do with. It was not until 1895 that the Court first cited Marbury as a precedent for judicial review of national law, despite having invalidated some 20 congressional acts by that time. Stop and think for a moment about what this means: The case that is used as the leading precedent for modern judicial supremacy was not even regarded as an instance of judicial review until 92 years after it was decided!”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: article.nationalreview.com

  • Tags: ,

More Internet domains = more porn

    OneNewsNow: “An attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) is encouraging people to weigh in as the period for public comment on the proposed triple-x Internet domain ends Monday . . . ‘I think we’re winning that battle,’ Trueman notes. ‘It doesn’t mean we’ll win the ultimate battle, but the more people we could get to weigh in, the more likely it is that there will not be a porn domain on the Internet where they will have a lot more porn than we’ve ever seen before.’”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Uncategorized
  • |
  • Source: www.onenewsnow.com

  • Tags: , ,

Kill the .XXX domain — Start a war on pornography instead

    ChristianNewsWire: “‘The .XXX domain should be killed and a stake driven through its heart so it never rises again,’ said Patrick Trueman, former U.S. Department of Justice pornography prosecutor. For more than ten years, the promoter of this new porn domain for the Internet has tried to get the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the Internet governing agency, to establish an additional place on the Internet for access to pornography, Trueman noted. ‘Not one sound argument has been put forward for why the world needs more Internet pornography.’”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.christiannewswire.com

  • Tags: , ,

Erik Stanley: Pastor’s conviction for ringing church bells overturned

Chuck Colson: National Day of Prayer and religious freedom

University of Wisconsin to find another location for late-term abortion center

Nurse’s rights violated, suit filed

Judge’s ruling won’t stifle day of prayer

WI: University disputes attorney general on abortion

    The Green Bay Press Gazette has published the same article regarding the Wisconsin DOJ letter obtained by the Alliance Defense Fund–which states that the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics has abandoned its plans to provide full-service, second-trimester abortion services in a jointly operated facility–with two different headlines: (1) University of Wisconsin Health hasn’t dropped plans for abortions at Madison clinic; (2) University disputes attorney general on abortion. Both articles quote UW Hospitals and Clinics Authority Board Chairman David Walsh who says, “We have not made a decision not to go forward,” and both include this comment from Special Assistant Attorney General Kevin St. John, saying that his department “stands by the letter”: “‘Based on the information that the Department of Justice received from UW prior to writing this letter and information that has been confirmed subsequently, the letter is accurate,’ St. John said.”

    The Wisconsin State Journal clarifies the dispute: “The Madison Surgery Center is apparently abandoning plans to offer late-term abortions, with a statewide anti-abortion rights group claiming Wednesday that the decision is due to pressure from its group and others. But officials at UW Health, UW Hospital’s parent organization, issued a statement Wednesday saying it would continue to offer second-trimester abortions. The statement did not mention the Madison Surgery Center, and UW Health declined to clarify or answer questions.”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: ADF in the News

  • Tags: , , , ,

WI: Plans to provide “fresh fetal parts” abandoned

Hanging a bull’s-eye on Christian prayer

New York gives same-sex partners parental rights

D.C. “gay marriage” foes hopeful

University of Wisconsin drops abortion plans

Wisconsin facility abandons late-term abortion plan under pro-life fire

Beijing’s Plan For National Decline: Chinese population policies are both vile and counterproductive.

    Gordon G. Chang writes at Forbes: Chinese leaders these days congratulate themselves for the success of this much-criticized policy, which they credit for preventing up to 300 million births. Yet the program, which remains in effect, has inevitably created demographic abnormalities that cannot be remedied for decades. As Nicholas Eberstadt of the American Enterprise Institute writes in the Far Eastern Economic Review, “These problems will compromise economic development, strain social harmony and place the traditional Chinese family structure under severe pressure; in fact, they could shake Chinese civilization to its very foundations.”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: www.forbes.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

Oakland steps toward removing 1879 law against cross-dressing

Judge who struck down Day of Prayer in spotlight

Since Bork, a Long War Over the Court

Lecture: “The Bible and the Founding Fathers”

    FRC: “Daniel L. Dreisbach is a professor in the School of Public Affairs at American University in Washington, D.C. He received a Doctor of Philosophy degree from Oxford University, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar, and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Virginia. He has authored or edited seven books, including The Sacred Rights of Conscience (Liberty Fund, 2009), The Forgotten Founders on Religion and Public Life (Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 2009), and Thomas Jefferson and the Wall of Separation between Church and State (New York Univ. Press, 2002). He has published over 60 book chapters, reviews, and articles in scholarly journals, including American Journal of Legal History, Constitutional Commentary, Emory Law Journal, Journal of Church and State, North Carolina Law Review, and William and Mary Quarterly.” | Event Flyer


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , ,

Laws Shape Values — Witness Civil Rights Achievements

    Peter Wehner writes at EPPC: “James Davison Hunter, author of a new book, To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy, and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World, was recently the speaker at a conference on religion, politics, and public life, hosted by my Ethics and Public Policy Center colleague Michael Cromartie. Professor Hunter’s motivation to write his book grew out of his understandable frustration with the disparity between his understanding of Christian faith and the form of engagement it has taken in politics over the years . . . ”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.eppc.org

  • Tags:

Illinois House rejects vouchers

School Choice: What Parents Want

TN: Abortion opt-out becomes law without gov’s signature

Maggie Gallagher: Red Families, Blue Families?

Study: Older, unmarried, educated moms on rise

Disinvited evangelist prays at Pentagon anyway

9th Circuit: Religious Group In Prison Is “State Actor”

Students Disciplined for Praying Settle Case Against College

New U.S. Push to Regulate Internet Access

    Wall Street Journal: “In a move that will stoke a battle over the future of the Internet, the federal government plans to propose regulating broadband lines under decades-old rules designed for traditional phone networks . . . Mr. Genachowski is expected Thursday to outline his plan for regulating broadband lines. He wants to adopt ‘net neutrality’ rules that require Internet providers like Comcast Corp. and AT&T Inc. to treat all traffic equally, and not to slow or block access to websites.”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: online.wsj.com

  • Tags:

CA: Students Kicked Off Campus for Wearing American Flag Tee

    NBC: “Galli says he and his friends were sitting at a table during brunch break when the vice principal asked two of the boys to remove American flag bandannas that they wearing on their heads and for the others to turn their American flag T-shirts inside out. When they refused, the boys were ordered to go to the principal’s office.
    ‘They said we could wear it on any other day,” Daniel Galli said, “but today is sensitive to Mexican-Americans because it’s supposed to be their holiday so we were not allowed to wear it today.’”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.nbcbayarea.com

  • Tags: , ,

Law Review: Assessing the Constitutionality of Reproductive Technologies Regulation: A Bioethical Approach

    Assessing the Constitutionality of Reproductive Technologies Regulation: A Bioethical Approach
    Elyse Whitney Grant, 61 Hastings L.J. 997 (2010)

    “This Note articulates the problems with our current procreative liberty jurisprudence and proposes an alternate framework for balancing individual and States’ rights. First, I argue that precedential case law allows for the construction of a broad procreative liberty interest in accessing reproductive technological information from both preimplantation and prenatal genetic tests. Second, to balance procreative liberty and State interests, I propose the use of an analytical framework based upon Tom Beauchamp and James Childress’s four principles of bioethics: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and distributive justice. My hope is that these four principles will provide an objective language that the Court can use to articulate its ethical concerns and to create a more transparent dialogue between the liberty and State interests at issue. Lastly, I apply the four principles and speculate about the constitutionality of regulating access to information provided by reproductive technologies.”


  • Posted: 05/06/2010
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: www.uchastings.edu

  • Tags: , , ,