Sherif Girgis, Robert George, and Ryan T. Anderson, What is Marriage? (December 8, 2010). Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 34.1 (Winter 2010): 245-287 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722155
“In the article, we argue that as a moral reality, marriage is the union of a man and a woman who make a permanent and exclusive commitment to each other of the type that is naturally fulfilled by bearing and rearing children together, and renewed by acts that constitute the behavioral part of the process of reproduction. We further argue that there are decisive principled as well as prudential reasons for the state to enshrine this understanding of marriage in its positive law, and to resist the call to recognize as marriages the sexual unions of same-sex partners.
Besides making this positive argument for our position and raising several objections to the view that same-sex unions should be recognized, we address what we consider the strongest philosophical objections to our view of the nature of marriage, as well as more pragmatic concerns about the point or consequences of implementing it as a policy.”
- Posted: 12/08/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Marriage
Federalist Society: “Speakers: Jonathan Adler, Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University; Mark Strasser, Professor of Law, Capital University Law School; Edward Whelan, President of the Ethics and Public Policy Center . . . Does the Fourteenth Amendment require states to recognize same-sex marriages? A recent California federal district court case said that it does. Now the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is taking up the question, and the U.S. Supreme Court might do so in the near future, too. Our panel of experts will consider what the Constitution requires with respect to this controversial issue.”
- Posted: 12/08/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.fed-soc.org
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), Group: Federalist Society, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Jurisprudence, Topic: Marriage
TIME / Healthland: “S. Alexandra Burt, a behavioral geneticist at Michigan State University, looked at 289 genetically identical male twins to ascertain what difference getting hitched made to these otherwise very similar men. ‘Our results indicate that the reduced rate of antisocial behavior in married men is more complicated than we previously thought,’ said Burt. ‘Marriage is generally good for men, at least in terms of reducing antisocial behavior, but the data also indicates that it’s not random who enters into the state of marriage.’” Abstract is here.
- Posted: 12/08/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: healthland.time.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Culture, Topic: Marriage
CTV: “Chief Justice Robert Bauman is hearing from experts, as well as video testimony from former residents of Bountiful, B.C., and other polygamous communities, as he considers Canada’s current ban on multiple marriages. While current residents of Bountiful say they live happy lives, some past residents are calling it a cult and allege that abuse was rampant.”
- Posted: 12/08/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Marriage and Family
- |
- Source: calgary.ctv.ca
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Canada, Global: Marriage and Family, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Polygamy, ZZ: In the matter of the Constitutional Question Act RSBC 1986 c. 68
The Sun News (AP): “The plan, which was designed with the help of the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian civil rights group, is aimed to appease both critics of the original display of a lone Christian flag, and those who protested the flag’s removal . . . ‘Groups like Americans United for Separation have an extreme agenda that is trying to eradicate any recognition of our religious heritage in the public square,’ Infranco said. ‘I’m really puzzled as to how they could turn a policy that honors veterans into a constitutional crisis.’”
- Posted: 12/08/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.thesunnews.com
- Tags: ADF: Joe Infranco, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Americans United for Separation of Church and State, State: North Carolina, Topic: Monuments
The New American: “‘It was a very vigorous argument,’ [Jordan Lorence], senior counsel for the pro-family Alliance Defense Fund, said of the two-hour question and answer session between the judges and the attorneys for both sides of the issue . . . Nonetheless, added Lorence, the judges were ‘all over the place’ in their questioning of both sides in the debate, making it very difficult to predict how the court will ultimately rule on the appeal.”
- Posted: 12/08/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.thenewamerican.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry
The Catholic Review (CNS): “[Brian Raum], senior counsel for Alliance Defense Fund, a group supporting Proposition 8, said in a statement: ‘What’s at stake in this case is bigger than California and bigger than even marriage. Americans are concerned about how marriage, voter rights, religious liberty and other issues will be affected nationwide if this lawsuit is allowed to prevail.’”
- Posted: 12/08/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.catholicreview.org
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry
|

Latest Posts
-
www.bpnews.net
05/17/2013
Baptist Press: A florist who was told by the state of Washington she must provide her services for a gay wedding is countersuing the state, saying she has served gay customers her entire career and is concerned the state’s position on gay weddings will harm religious freedom.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/17/2013
National Review: IRS scandal notwithstanding, on Tuesday, the (Republican-dominated) Texas legislature passed S.B. 346, a bill to force non-profit organizations and trade associations to disclose the names of the people who support them financially. The law exempts unions, but covers groups that spend more than $25,000 or more in independent expenditures about political candidates. This applies even if those expenditures are a tiny fraction of the group’s overall spending . . .
-
www.nytimes.com
05/17/2013
NY Times: At the first Congressional hearing into the I.R.S. scandal, J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, told members of the House Ways and Means Committee that he informed the Treasury’s general counsel of his audit on June 4, and Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal Wolin “shortly thereafter.”

|