Times Online: “Up to 95,000 descendants of the prophet Muhammad are planning to bring a libel action in Britain over ‘blasphemous’ cartoons of the founder of Islam, even though they were published in the Danish press . . . Yamani is expected to justify the action by claiming that the cartoons, including one of Muhammad wearing a bomb-shaped turban, were accessible in Britain on the internet. Critics say the case is a political stunt and yet another example of how England has become the leading destination for ‘libel tourism’. The English defamation laws make it easier to bring and win libel cases here than in jurisdictions such as America that place greater emphasis on freedom of speech.”
- Posted: 03/22/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Denmark, Country: United Kingdom, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Islam
Times Online: “A headmistress forced from her job after a campaign by two Muslim governors to give Islam a greater presence in a state school is entitled to £400,000 damages, the Court of Appeal has ruled. Erica Connor, 57, left the New Monument primary school in Woking, Surrey, because of stress after she was accused of Islamophobia.”
- Posted: 03/19/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: United Kingdom, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, Topic: Islam
Janice Turner writes at Times Online: “For the past decade the default setting for pornography — into our homes, on to our screens and newstands, into the mainstream of our culture — has been ‘on’. And parents were expected to guard their children from a tide of imagery. But how? We could faddle with Google settings, frown over screening software, which is quickly overridden by faster, more techno-literate young minds. We could, as advised, stand vigil over the household PC. But why are we lumbered with this grave yet impossible task? (What about parents who were too busy?) Why, if the Government believed that children should be protected, did it not come to our aid? Why did it not set the nation’s porn default setting to ‘off’?”
- Posted: 02/26/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: United Kingdom, Global: Miscellaneous, Topic: Internet, Topic: Pornography
LifeSiteNews: “Britain’s Labour government clarified this week that an amendment to the Children, Schools and Families bill, that says faith schools may teach the mandatory Personal Social and Health Education (PSHE) program ‘in a way that reflects the school’s religious character,’ does not, in fact, give the schools freedom to oppose abortion, contraception and homosexual activity on moral grounds.”
- Posted: 02/24/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: Country: United Kingdom, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Sex Indoctrination
Religious Liberty in British Courts: A Critique and Some Guidance
Robin Hopkins and Can V. Yeginsu, 49 Harv. Int’l L.J. Online 28 (2008)
“For centuries, religious liberty in Britain existed as a broad-ranging but principally negative freedom at common law. Individuals were permitted to do as they pleased in matters of faith, unless the law stated otherwise.[1] Religious liberty, thus conceived, was more passive toleration of religion than any active promotion of religious freedom as a fundamental right. All that changed on October 2, 2000 when the Human Rights Act 1998 (‘HRA’) – the United Kingdom’s de facto Bill of Rights – came into full force and brought with it Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights (‘ECHR’).”
- Posted: 02/22/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Bench and Bar
- |
- Source: www.harvardilj.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: European Union, Country: United Kingdom, Global: Bench and Bar, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: International Law, Topic: Legal Periodicals
Guardian: “Campaigners today accused the government of performing a U-turn over sex education in faith schools, after changes to a bill they said would allow the schools to discourage the use of contraception and teach that homosexuality is wrong . . . an amendment tabled by the schools secretary, Ed Balls, last week, says these rules should not be read as preventing governing bodies or heads from letting the subject be taught in a way that reflects the school’s religious ethos.”
- Posted: 02/19/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.guardian.co.uk
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: United Kingdom, Global: Religious Freedom, Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Education, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Sex Indoctrination
Christian Post: “The Church of England’s governing body on Friday approved a motion that emphasizes the compatibility of belief in both God and science . . . The compatibility, or lack thereof, of evolution and faith remains a hot debate among Christians. Prominent evangelical theologian Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr. has said he finds it impossible to reconcile the two. While he does not deny that changes do take place in the animal kingdom and that there is even a process of natural selection, he firmly rejects theistic evolution and the argument that the process is entirely natural and in no case supernatural.”
- Posted: 02/12/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.christianpost.com
- Tags: Country: United Kingdom, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Evolution
|
Latest Posts
-
05/24/2012
The ADF Alliance Alert will not be published on Friday, May 25th and Monday, May 28th.
-
www.huffingtonpost.com
05/24/2012
Huffington Post: A measure allowing same-sex civil unions passed its first legislative step in Brazil’s Congress, where it has lingered for 16 years.
-
www.christianpost.com
05/24/2012
Christian Post: “There has to be a wall institutionally between the government and the church or religious groups,” he said. “But many have taken that law of separation to think that it means separating religion from politics, which is precisely the opposite of what the Founding Fathers wanted.”
|