<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Court: DC Circuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/court-dc-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Janice Brown Writes Scathing Economic Rights Concurrence</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/01/judge-janice-brown-writes-scathing-economic-rights-concurrence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/01/judge-janice-brown-writes-scathing-economic-rights-concurrence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hettinga v. United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=132574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/dc_circuit/2012/04/judge-janice-brown-has-scathing-concurrence-on-economic-rights-case.html?DCMP=NWL-pro_top">Findlaw</a>: This case is part of the economic rights debate, which grew more heated in the Obamacare lawsuits. The scathing opinion of the judges here shows the controversy over government regulation over economic rights and whether the courts should assert more power to overturn infringing laws. Brown has been highly vocal over the years on economic issues, at times comparing liberal economic policies with slavery <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/01/judge-janice-brown-writes-scathing-economic-rights-concurrence/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/05/01/judge-janice-brown-writes-scathing-economic-rights-concurrence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Appeals Court opinion criticizes SCOTUS precedents that undermine economic freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/16/u-s-court-of-appeals-d-c-concurrence-criticizes-supreme-court-precedents-that-have-undermined-american-economic-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/16/u-s-court-of-appeals-d-c-concurrence-criticizes-supreme-court-precedents-that-have-undermined-american-economic-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hettinga v. United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=131213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Orin Kerr posts excerpts of the opinion at the <a href="http://volokh.com/2012/04/14/judges-brown-and-sentelle-urge-the-supreme-court-to-end-rational-basis-review-of-economic-regulations/">Volokh Conspiracy Blog</a> (Judges Brown and Sentelle Urge the Supreme Court to End Rational Basis Review of Economic Regulations): America’s cowboy capitalism was long ago disarmed by a democratic process increasingly dominated by powerful groups with economic interests antithetical to competitors and consumers. And the courts, from which the victims of burdensome regulation sought protection, have been negotiating the terms of surrender since the 1930s . . . The hope of correction at the ballot box is purely illusory . . .  &#124; <a href="http://volokh.com/2012/04/14/judges-brown-and-sentelle-urge-the-supreme-court-to-end-rational-basis-review-of-economic-regulations/">Hettinga v. United States</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/16/u-s-court-of-appeals-d-c-concurrence-criticizes-supreme-court-precedents-that-have-undermined-american-economic-freedom/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/04/16/u-s-court-of-appeals-d-c-concurrence-criticizes-supreme-court-precedents-that-have-undermined-american-economic-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis: Obama yet to make a mark on key U.S. court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/27/analysis-obama-yet-to-make-a-mark-on-key-u-s-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/27/analysis-obama-yet-to-make-a-mark-on-key-u-s-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=126932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-rt-us-court-obamatre81n0mq-20120224,0,349579.story">Chicago Tribune</a>: The D.C. Circuit, as it is called, is also often a springboard to the Supreme Court where four of the current nine justices served on the D.C. Circuit. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/27/analysis-obama-yet-to-make-a-mark-on-key-u-s-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/27/analysis-obama-yet-to-make-a-mark-on-key-u-s-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit: Seniors can&#8217;t reject Medicare right</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/07/u-s-court-of-appeals-d-c-circuit-seniors-cant-reject-medicare-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/07/u-s-court-of-appeals-d-c-circuit-seniors-cant-reject-medicare-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hall v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MEDICARE_LAWSUIT?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2012-02-07-12-36-07">News from The Associated Press</a>: A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that seniors who receive Social Security cannot reject their legal right to Medicare benefits, in a rare case of Americans suing to get out of a government entitlement. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/07/u-s-court-of-appeals-d-c-circuit-seniors-cant-reject-medicare-right/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/02/07/u-s-court-of-appeals-d-c-circuit-seniors-cant-reject-medicare-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston Globe Editorial on the Halligan nomination to the D.C. Circuit : &#8220;Outrage machine grinds away&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/boston-globe-editorial-on-the-halligan-nomination-to-the-d-c-circuit-outrage-machine-grinds-away/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/boston-globe-editorial-on-the-halligan-nomination-to-the-d-c-circuit-outrage-machine-grinds-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2011/12/06/outrage-machine-grinds-away/sNpPzxk577gSSk6xWqbuxJ/story.html">Editorials - The Boston Globe</a>: Discrediting Perfectly  qualified nominees to the federal judiciary is a dreary, familiar business - one whose latest target is Caitlin Halligan, a former New York solicitor general who once clerked for Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. Ever since President Obama nominated her for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals last year, critics have been combing her record for evidence of dangerous radicalism. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/boston-globe-editorial-on-the-halligan-nomination-to-the-d-c-circuit-outrage-machine-grinds-away/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/boston-globe-editorial-on-the-halligan-nomination-to-the-d-c-circuit-outrage-machine-grinds-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Republicans Stop Another Obama Pro-Abortion Judge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/senate-republicans-stop-another-obama-pro-abortion-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/senate-republicans-stop-another-obama-pro-abortion-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=120139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Republicans on Tuesday successfully filibustered the nomination of pro-abortion judicial nominee Caitlin Halligan to replace Supreme Court Justice John Roberts on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, considered to be the nation’s second most important court. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/senate-republicans-stop-another-obama-pro-abortion-judge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/06/senate-republicans-stop-another-obama-pro-abortion-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Cir.: Cloture filed on Halligan nomination</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/d-c-cir-cloture-filed-on-halligan-nomination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/d-c-cir-cloture-filed-on-halligan-nomination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://democrats.senate.gov/2011/12/01/cloture-filed-on-halligan-nomination/">Senate Democrats</a>: This evening Senator Reid filed cloture on the nomination of Caitlin Joan Halligan, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/d-c-cir-cloture-filed-on-halligan-nomination/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/12/02/d-c-cir-cloture-filed-on-halligan-nomination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longtime Appellate Lawyer Nominated For D.C. Court of Appeals</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/18/longtime-appellate-lawyer-nominated-for-d-c-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/18/longtime-appellate-lawyer-nominated-for-d-c-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/11/longtime-appellate-lawyer-nominated-for-dc-court-of-appeals-.html">The Blog of Legal Times</a>: Roy McLeese III, a veteran appellate attorney in Washington, was nominated Thursday to a slot on the D.C. Court of Appeals. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/18/longtime-appellate-lawyer-nominated-for-d-c-court-of-appeals/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/18/longtime-appellate-lawyer-nominated-for-d-c-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit upholds Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/u-s-court-of-appeals-for-circuit-of-d-c-upholds-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/u-s-court-of-appeals-for-circuit-of-d-c-upholds-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=118046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Appealing links to reports and the ruling. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/u-s-court-of-appeals-for-circuit-of-d-c-upholds-obamacare/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/08/u-s-court-of-appeals-for-circuit-of-d-c-upholds-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama asks ABA to vet Adegbile for Supreme Court’s farm team</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/31/obama-asks-aba-to-vet-adegbile-for-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-farm-team/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/31/obama-asks-aba-to-vet-adegbile-for-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-farm-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: NAACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=117356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/obama-asks-aba-to-vet-adegbile-for-supreme-courts-farm-team/2011/10/28/gIQAh9UbWM_blog.html">The Washington Post</a> reports on Obama's latest nomination to the D.C. Circuit. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/31/obama-asks-aba-to-vet-adegbile-for-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-farm-team/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/31/obama-asks-aba-to-vet-adegbile-for-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-farm-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oral Argument in the DC Circuit Mandate Case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/29/oral-argument-in-the-dc-circuit-mandate-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/29/oral-argument-in-the-dc-circuit-mandate-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Seven-Sky v. Holder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=114974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Randy Barnett at <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/09/27/oral-argument-in-the-dc-circuit-mandate-case/">The Volokh Conspiracy</a>: The low point for the government was when Judges Kavanaugh and Silberman pressed counsel for about 10 minutes for a single example of any economic mandate that would be unconstitutional under the government’s theory of constitutionality. To their evident frustration, she refused to provide any such example. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/29/oral-argument-in-the-dc-circuit-mandate-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/29/oral-argument-in-the-dc-circuit-mandate-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Health-Care Law Gets Mixed Reaction From Appeals Court: Judge Asks If Retirement Account Mandate is Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/26/obama-health-care-law-gets-mixed-reaction-from-appeals-court-judge-asks-if-retirement-account-mandate-is-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/26/obama-health-care-law-gets-mixed-reaction-from-appeals-court-judge-asks-if-retirement-account-mandate-is-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Seven-Sky v. Holder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=114538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-23/obama-health-care-law-argued-before-appeals-judges-in-washington.html">Bloomberg</a>: “In 220 years there has been a whole lot of laws and a lot of crises, yet Congress has never once mandated a purchase,” said Judge Brett Kavanaugh, adding that the “lurking next step” might be a law requiring investment in private retirement accounts. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/26/obama-health-care-law-gets-mixed-reaction-from-appeals-court-judge-asks-if-retirement-account-mandate-is-next/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/09/26/obama-health-care-law-gets-mixed-reaction-from-appeals-court-judge-asks-if-retirement-account-mandate-is-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Circuit on the New “Advanced Imaging Technology” Airport Searches</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/18/d-c-circuit-on-the-new-%e2%80%9cadvanced-imaging-technology%e2%80%9d-airport-searches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/18/d-c-circuit-on-the-new-%e2%80%9cadvanced-imaging-technology%e2%80%9d-airport-searches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=108348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://volokh.com/2011/07/15/d-c-circuit-on-the-new-advanced-imaging-technology-airport-searches/">The Volokh Conspiracy</a>: From <a href="http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/B3100471112A40DE852578CE004FE42C/$file/10-1157-1318805.pdf">Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security</a> (D.C. Cir., decided this morning) . . . <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/18/d-c-circuit-on-the-new-%e2%80%9cadvanced-imaging-technology%e2%80%9d-airport-searches/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/07/18/d-c-circuit-on-the-new-%e2%80%9cadvanced-imaging-technology%e2%80%9d-airport-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Circuit: Child Pornography Victim Owed More Restitution</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/19/d-c-circuit-child-pornography-victim-owed-more-restitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/19/d-c-circuit-child-pornography-victim-owed-more-restitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: U.S. v. Monzel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=101449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The appeals court said Kessler must “order restitution equal to the amount of harm the government proves the defendant caused the victim.” <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/19/d-c-circuit-child-pornography-victim-owed-more-restitution/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/19/d-c-circuit-child-pornography-victim-owed-more-restitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Candidates for D.C. Federal Court Head to Full Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/04/two-candidates-for-d-c-federal-court-head-to-full-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/04/two-candidates-for-d-c-federal-court-head-to-full-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=94690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/02/two-candidates-for-dc-federal-court-head-to-full-senate.html">Blog of the Legal Times</a>: "Among the nominations are two candidates for spots on the bench of Washington’s federal trial court. Judge James Boasberg of the District of Columbia Superior Court and Amy Jackson, a partner at Washington-based Trout Cacheris, have both been nominated for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/04/two-candidates-for-d-c-federal-court-head-to-full-senate/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/04/two-candidates-for-d-c-federal-court-head-to-full-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s D.C. Circuit Pick Meets Skeptical Republicans</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/03/obamas-d-c-circuit-pick-meets-skeptical-republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/03/obamas-d-c-circuit-pick-meets-skeptical-republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=94560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/02/obamas-dc-circuit-pick-caitlin-halligan-meets-skeptical-republicans.html">Blog of the Legal Times</a>: "Caitlin Halligan followed an often-used script today during her confirmation hearing for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, telling a Senate committee that if confirmed, she would defer to Supreme Court precedent and to the Framers' intent. But her hour-long testimony made clear that Republicans are laying the ground for possible opposition to her nomination." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/03/obamas-d-c-circuit-pick-meets-skeptical-republicans/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/02/03/obamas-d-c-circuit-pick-meets-skeptical-republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DC Circuit upholds FTC jurisdiction over purported religious organization</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/16/dc-circuit-upholds-ftc-jurisdiction-over-purported-religious-organization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/16/dc-circuit-upholds-ftc-jurisdiction-over-purported-religious-organization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Case Filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Daniel Chapter One v. FTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=87077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/12/dc-circuit-upholds-ftc-jurisdiction.html">Religion Clause</a>: "In <em>Daniel Chapter One v. FTC</em>, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25496 (DC Cir., Dec. 10 2010), the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals held that an organization's formal legal status as a religious corporation sole does not prevent the Federal Trade Commission from regulating its advertisements for dietary supplements." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/16/dc-circuit-upholds-ftc-jurisdiction-over-purported-religious-organization/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/16/dc-circuit-upholds-ftc-jurisdiction-over-purported-religious-organization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Admin suggests more embryonic stem cell funding</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/obama-admin-suggests-more-embryonic-stem-cell-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/obama-admin-suggests-more-embryonic-stem-cell-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Family Research Council (FRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: National Institutes of Health (NIH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=86152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2010/12/13/bio-3232/">LifeNews</a>: "Taking advantage of an appeals court ruling striking down an injunction against his forcing Americans to pay for embryonic stem cell research, the Obama administration is looking at more funding . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/obama-admin-suggests-more-embryonic-stem-cell-funding/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/13/obama-admin-suggests-more-embryonic-stem-cell-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court to hear lawsuit on Obama&#8217;s embryonic stem cell funds</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/court-to-hear-lawsuit-on-obamas-embryonic-stem-cell-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/court-to-hear-lawsuit-on-obamas-embryonic-stem-cell-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=84763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2010/12/02/bio-3223/">LifeNews</a>: "The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia will hear oral arguments Monday in the appeal of a lower court ruling related to the lawsuit brought by stem cell research scientists . . . [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-steven-h-aden/">Steven Aden</a>], a lead attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund applauded [the lower court's ruling]. 'The American people should not be forced to pay for experiments — prohibited by federal law — that destroy human life,' he said." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/court-to-hear-lawsuit-on-obamas-embryonic-stem-cell-funds/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/02/court-to-hear-lawsuit-on-obamas-embryonic-stem-cell-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DC Circuit: Federal employee need not relitigate religious discrimination victory to appeal retaliation holding</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/06/dc-circuit-federal-employee-need-not-relitigate-religious-discrimination-victory-to-appeal-retaliation-holding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/06/dc-circuit-federal-employee-need-not-relitigate-religious-discrimination-victory-to-appeal-retaliation-holding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Title VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Case Filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Payne v. Salazar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=75321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/10/dc-circuit-federal-employee-need-not.html">Religion Clause</a>: "In <a href="http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/201009/09-5291-1264254.pdf"><em>Payne v. Salazar</em></a>, (DC Cir., Sept. 7, 2010), . . . Department of Interior employee Cassandra Payne won her religious discrimination clam at the administrative level. An EEOC administrative judge found that the Interior Department had violated Title VII by refusing Payne's requests for weekends off so she could attend church and Bible study . . ." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/06/dc-circuit-federal-employee-need-not-relitigate-religious-discrimination-victory-to-appeal-retaliation-holding/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/06/dc-circuit-federal-employee-need-not-relitigate-religious-discrimination-victory-to-appeal-retaliation-holding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama names two to U.S. Circuit Courts</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/president-obama-names-two-to-u-s-circuit-courts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/president-obama-names-two-to-u-s-circuit-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=74332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/29/president-obama-names-two-us-circuit-courts-0">White House</a>: "Today, President Obama nominated Caitlin Halligan for a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and Jimmie V. Reyna to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/president-obama-names-two-to-u-s-circuit-courts/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/president-obama-names-two-to-u-s-circuit-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Controversial research to continue</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/controversial-research-to-continue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/controversial-research-to-continue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=74306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=1189452">OneNewsNow</a>: "'The American taxpayers said 15 years ago that public funding cannot be provided for embryonic stem-cell research, and this is a test in the courts [on] whether the rule of law will be upheld or whether taxpayer dollars will continue to be used for research that has proven to be unproductive, unlawful, and unethical,' ADF attorney [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-steven-h-aden/">Steve Aden</a>] comments about the latest decision." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/controversial-research-to-continue/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/30/controversial-research-to-continue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to tap NY lawyer for DC circuit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/obama-to-tap-ny-lawyer-for-dc-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/obama-to-tap-ny-lawyer-for-dc-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=74259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_JUDGES?SITE=AP&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2010-09-29-17-37-16">Associated Press</a>: "A government official said Wednesday that Obama was nominating Caitlin Halligan, general counsel at the D.A.'s office, to the court. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the nomination had not been made public." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/obama-to-tap-ny-lawyer-for-dc-circuit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/obama-to-tap-ny-lawyer-for-dc-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge lifts ban on federal funding of embryonic stem-cell research</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/judge-lifts-ban-on-federal-funding-of-embryonic-stem-cell-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/judge-lifts-ban-on-federal-funding-of-embryonic-stem-cell-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=74254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/congress/4733-judge-lifts-ban-on-federal-funding-of-stem-cell-research">The New American</a>: "The Alliance Defense Fund is involved in the lawsuit that challenges the use of federal funds for embryonic stem-cell research. [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-steven-h-aden/">Steven Aden</a>], senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund reacted to the Appeals Court decision. 'We believe it’s a shame that they would rush to push funding of embryonic stem cell research, and a waste of taxpayer money.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/judge-lifts-ban-on-federal-funding-of-embryonic-stem-cell-research/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/29/judge-lifts-ban-on-federal-funding-of-embryonic-stem-cell-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals Court allows Obama to fund embryonic stem cell research during suit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/appeals-court-allows-obama-to-fund-embryonic-stem-cell-research-during-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/appeals-court-allows-obama-to-fund-embryonic-stem-cell-research-during-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/appeals-court-allows-obama-to-fund-embryonic-stem-cell-research-during-suit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A federal appeals court has lifted the injunction a federal judge put in place stopping President Barack Obama from forcing taxpayers to finance unproven embryonic stem cell research while scientists continue with their lawsuit against the funding." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/appeals-court-allows-obama-to-fund-embryonic-stem-cell-research-during-suit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/appeals-court-allows-obama-to-fund-embryonic-stem-cell-research-during-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court questions Obama Admin lawyers on embryonic research funding appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/court-questions-obama-admin-lawyers-on-embryonic-research-funding-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/court-questions-obama-admin-lawyers-on-embryonic-research-funding-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=73933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/bio3184.html">LifeNews</a>: "The Obama administration argued with an appeals court on Monday to overturn the decision a federal judge issued to temporarily halt taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research that destroys human lives to produce. They claimed the temporary funding ban would hurt scientific research . . . [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-steven-h-aden/">Steven Aden</a>], a lead attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund applauded Lamberth's decision. 'The American people should not be forced to pay for experiments -- prohibited by federal law -- that destroy human life,' he said. 'The court is simply enforcing an existing law passed by Congress that prevents Americans from paying another penny for needless research on human embryos.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/court-questions-obama-admin-lawyers-on-embryonic-research-funding-appeal/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/court-questions-obama-admin-lawyers-on-embryonic-research-funding-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court: Cert Filed In Challenge To Inauguration Oath and Prayers</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/us-supreme-court-cert-filed-in-challenge-to-inauguration-oath-and-prayers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/us-supreme-court-cert-filed-in-challenge-to-inauguration-oath-and-prayers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Newdow v. Roberts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/us-supreme-court-cert-filed-in-challenge-to-inauguration-oath-and-prayers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/09/cert-filed-in-challenge-to-inauguration.html">Religion Clause Blog</a>: "Yesterday a Petition for Certiorari (<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/38279032/Newdow-v-Roberts-Cert-Petition-FINAL">full text</a>) was filed with the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to review the D.C. Circuit's decision in Newdow v. Roberts." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/us-supreme-court-cert-filed-in-challenge-to-inauguration-oath-and-prayers/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/28/us-supreme-court-cert-filed-in-challenge-to-inauguration-oath-and-prayers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court considers ban on stem cell research</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/appeals-court-considers-ban-on-stem-cell-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/appeals-court-considers-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=73732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_STEM_CELLS?SITE=AP&#38;SECTION=HOME&#38;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#38;CTIME=2010-09-27-12-01-33">Associated Press</a>: "Judge Thomas Griffith questioned whether the work would really be irreparably harmed or just delayed if the government ultimately can win the ongoing case." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/appeals-court-considers-ban-on-stem-cell-research/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/27/appeals-court-considers-ban-on-stem-cell-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three-judge panel asks for oral arguments on stem cell ban</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/17/three-judge-panel-asks-for-oral-arguments-on-stem-cell-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/17/three-judge-panel-asks-for-oral-arguments-on-stem-cell-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Advocates International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: National Institutes of Health (NIH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=72643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://tech.mit.edu/V130/N37/stemcells.html">The Tech (MIT)</a>: "Arguments will be heard at 10 a.m. on Monday, Sept. 27. It had previously been expected the court would decide on the strength of briefs filed before it, the last of which is due Sept. 20. The court will probably rule a few days after oral argument . . . The lawyers for Sherley and Deisher, are all working pro bono, meaning free of charge, because they believe the work is in the public interest. The lead counsel is Thomas G. Hungar, a partner at the high-powered law firm of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher; five Gibson Dunn associates are also on the case. They are joined by Samuel B. Casey of Advocates International and Steven H. Aden of the Alliance Defense Fund." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/17/three-judge-panel-asks-for-oral-arguments-on-stem-cell-ban/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/17/three-judge-panel-asks-for-oral-arguments-on-stem-cell-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Circuit to hear stem cell case Sept. 27</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/d-c-circuit-to-hear-stem-cell-case-sept-27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/d-c-circuit-to-hear-stem-cell-case-sept-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: National Institutes of Health (NIH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=72625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/09/dc-circuit-to-hear-stem-cell-case-sept-27.html">Blog of LegalTimes</a>: "A federal appeals court in Washington will hear oral argument Sept. 27 in the government's challenge of a preliminary injunction that blocks funding for human embryonic stem cell research." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/d-c-circuit-to-hear-stem-cell-case-sept-27/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/d-c-circuit-to-hear-stem-cell-case-sept-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plaintiffs lawyers urge court to keep injunction in stem cell case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/plaintiffs-lawyers-urge-court-to-keep-injunction-in-stem-cell-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/plaintiffs-lawyers-urge-court-to-keep-injunction-in-stem-cell-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: National Institutes of Health (NIH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=72486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202472092940&#038;Plaintiffs_Lawyers_Urge_Court_to_Keep_Injunction_in_Stem_Cell_Case">Law.com</a>: "The Gibson team, working with Washington's Alliance Defense Fund and Fairfax, Va.-based Advocates International, said in the court papers that a stay pending appeal 'would lead to a flight of federal dollars into [human embryonic stem cell] research,' hurting Sherley and Deisher and other National Institutes of Health grant applicants." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/plaintiffs-lawyers-urge-court-to-keep-injunction-in-stem-cell-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/16/plaintiffs-lawyers-urge-court-to-keep-injunction-in-stem-cell-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court temporarily lifts ban on stem cell funding</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/court-temporarily-lifts-ban-on-stem-cell-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/court-temporarily-lifts-ban-on-stem-cell-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Advocates International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=72358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/healthscience/2010/September/Court-Temporarily-Lifts-Ban-on-Stem-Cell-Funding/">CBN News</a> (video): "Steven Aden, senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, discussed the immediate impact of the ruling and more on the Friday, September 10 edition of CBN Newschannel's Morning program." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/court-temporarily-lifts-ban-on-stem-cell-funding/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/court-temporarily-lifts-ban-on-stem-cell-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court asked to reverse decision allowing embryonic research funding</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/appeals-court-asked-to-reverse-decision-allowing-embryonic-research-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/appeals-court-asked-to-reverse-decision-allowing-embryonic-research-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Steven H. Aden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Advocates International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=72297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifenews.com/bio3176.html">LifeNews</a>: "Today, attorneys for Advocates International, part of the pro-life legal team with the Alliance Defense Fund and the law firm Gibson, Dunn &#038; Crutcher, filed their 147-page opposition to the government's 165-page request for an emergency stay of the federal district court's order preventing funding while the case continues." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/appeals-court-asked-to-reverse-decision-allowing-embryonic-research-funding/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/appeals-court-asked-to-reverse-decision-allowing-embryonic-research-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal court of appeals asked to allow enjoinder of federally funded embryonic stem cell research</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/federal-court-of-appeals-asked-to-allow-enjoinder-of-federally-funded-embryonic-stem-cell-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/federal-court-of-appeals-asked-to-allow-enjoinder-of-federally-funded-embryonic-stem-cell-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Advocates International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=72296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.advocatesinternational.org/">Advocates International (AI)</a>, part of the public interest legal team along with the <a href="http://www.telladf.org/">Alliance Defense Fund (ADF)</a> and  <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Pages/default.aspx">Gibson, Dunn &#038; Crutcher (GD&#038;C)</a> who brought the case before the court more than a year ago, announced this evening that their clients have now filed in the federal court of appeals their <a href="http://www.advocatesinternational.org/sites/default/files/webfm/DC_Circuit_Opp_to_Motion_to_Stay_with_Supp_Add.pdf">147-page opposition</a> to the government's 165-page request for an emergency stay of the federal district court's order enjoining the government's unlawful, unethical and unnecessary federal funding of research involving the destruction of living human embryos pending the government's appeal of that court's preliminary injunction order. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/federal-court-of-appeals-asked-to-allow-enjoinder-of-federally-funded-embryonic-stem-cell-research/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/15/federal-court-of-appeals-asked-to-allow-enjoinder-of-federally-funded-embryonic-stem-cell-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US stem cell research potentially back on track</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/13/us-stem-cell-research-potentially-back-on-track/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/13/us-stem-cell-research-potentially-back-on-track/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=71953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_70605.asp">BioNews</a>: "A federal appeals court in the US has ruled that federal funding for embryonic stem (ES) cell research may continue and an injunction placed on the funding by a lower court last month is temporarily suspended . . . Opponents argue that federal funds should not be used in research that involves the destruction of what many consider human life and that the benefits of the research are as yet unproven. 'We believe it's a shame that they would rush to push funding of ES cell research, and a waste of taxpayer money,' said a lawyer instructed by the Alliance Defense Fund which is involved in bring the action against the NIH. Opponents have been asked to file a response to the court by 14 September and the Government must then submit its response six days later." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/13/us-stem-cell-research-potentially-back-on-track/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/09/13/us-stem-cell-research-potentially-back-on-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

