<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Court: European Court of Justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/court-european-court-of-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Britain, Czechs snub Europe&#8217;s fiscal pact but won&#8217;t forge an alliance of critics</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/31/britain-czechs-snub-europes-fiscal-pact-but-wont-forge-an-alliance-of-critics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/31/britain-czechs-snub-europes-fiscal-pact-but-wont-forge-an-alliance-of-critics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=124595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-bc-eu--europe-theoutsiders,0,244293.story">ChicagoTribune.com</a>: "This is a treaty outside of the EU," British leader David Cameron insisted Tuesday at the House of Commons. "We are not signing it. We are not ratifying it. We are not part of it." The decision by Cameron and Czech Prime Minister Petr Necas to reject the deal leaves Europe with a clumsy compromise and has thrown up legal questions about using EU-wide institutions like the European Court of Justice to enforce the pact. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/31/britain-czechs-snub-europes-fiscal-pact-but-wont-forge-an-alliance-of-critics/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2012/01/31/britain-czechs-snub-europes-fiscal-pact-but-wont-forge-an-alliance-of-critics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Kiska at European Parliament press conference: There is NO international right to abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/21/roger-kiska-at-european-parliament-press-conference-there-is-no-international-right-to-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/21/roger-kiska-at-european-parliament-press-conference-there-is-no-international-right-to-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Roger Kiska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/21/roger-kiska-at-european-parliament-press-conference-there-is-no-international-right-to-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Europe court bans stem cell technique patents</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/top-europe-court-bans-stem-cell-technique-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/top-europe-court-bans-stem-cell-technique-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Bioethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=116094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Union's top court ruled Tuesday that scientists cannot patent stem cell techniques that use human embryos for research purposes, a ruling some scientists said threatens important research since no one could profit from it. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/top-europe-court-bans-stem-cell-technique-patents/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/10/18/top-europe-court-bans-stem-cell-technique-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU Court of Justices wants 12 more judges</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/21/eu-court-of-justices-wants-12-more-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/21/eu-court-of-justices-wants-12-more-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=106962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.europolitics.info/president-wants-12-extra-judges-to-cope-with-heavy-workload-art307589.html">Europolitics</a>: The president of the EU Court of Justice wants 12 more judges to enable his institution to cope with its increased workload. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/21/eu-court-of-justices-wants-12-more-judges/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/06/21/eu-court-of-justices-wants-12-more-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Court: Couples in civil unions must receive same retirement benefits as married couples</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/european-court-couples-in-civil-unions-must-receive-same-retirement-benefits-as-married-couples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/european-court-couples-in-civil-unions-must-receive-same-retirement-benefits-as-married-couples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 13:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=103303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["In a precedent-setting move, Europe's highest court ruled Tuesday that couples in same-sex civil unions deserve the same retirement benefits as those who are married." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/european-court-couples-in-civil-unions-must-receive-same-retirement-benefits-as-married-couples/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/10/european-court-couples-in-civil-unions-must-receive-same-retirement-benefits-as-married-couples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU Nations Can&#8217;t Jail Illegal Immigrants</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/eu-nations-cant-jail-illegal-immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/eu-nations-cant-jail-illegal-immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 21:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=102797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/05/04/36334.htm">Courthouse News Service</a>: The highest court of the European Union ruled that member states may not jail immigrants who enter their countries illegally and then refuse to leave. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/eu-nations-cant-jail-illegal-immigrants/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/05/04/eu-nations-cant-jail-illegal-immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU: Top court throws out Italian law making illegal immigration a crime</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/28/eu-top-court-throws-out-italian-law-making-illegal-immigration-a-crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/28/eu-top-court-throws-out-italian-law-making-illegal-immigration-a-crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=102282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.adnkronos.com/IGN/Aki/English/Security/EU-Top-court-throws-out-Italian-law-making-illegal-immigration-a-crime_311952970935.html">ADNKronos</a>: The EU Court of Justice ruled that jailing migrants contradicts an EU directive whose main objective is "to set up an effective policy to drive out and repatriate third country nationals whose stay (in the EU) is irregular, while respecting their fundamental rights," the court said in a statement. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/28/eu-top-court-throws-out-italian-law-making-illegal-immigration-a-crime/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/28/eu-top-court-throws-out-italian-law-making-illegal-immigration-a-crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruling on stem-cell patents may spell end of research in Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/28/ruling-on-stem-cell-patents-may-spell-end-of-research-in-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/28/ruling-on-stem-cell-patents-may-spell-end-of-research-in-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=102247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ruling-on-stemcell-patents-may-spell-end-of-research-in-europe-2275771.html">The Independent</a>: A fledgling biosciences industry that promises to revolutionise medicine in the 21st century could be destroyed by a French judge who has declared it immoral to patent inventions based on cells derived from human embryos. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/28/ruling-on-stem-cell-patents-may-spell-end-of-research-in-europe/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/28/ruling-on-stem-cell-patents-may-spell-end-of-research-in-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists oppose European stem cell patent ban</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/27/scientists-oppose-european-stem-cell-patent-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/27/scientists-oppose-european-stem-cell-patent-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=102169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/27/europe-stemcells-scientists-idUSLDE73Q1AR20110427">Reuters</a>: Research scientists hit out on Wednesday at a European Court of Justice (ECJ) case they say could block development of embryonic stem cell-based therapies in Europe. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/27/scientists-oppose-european-stem-cell-patent-ban/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/27/scientists-oppose-european-stem-cell-patent-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reform of the European Court of Human Rights: response to a modest proposal</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/reform-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-response-to-a-modest-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/reform-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-response-to-a-modest-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=100040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/04/04/reform-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-response-to-a-modest-proposal/">UK Human Rights Blog</a>: In an interesting post, Aidan O’Neill QC concludes that the European Court of Human Rights is “in danger of imminent collapse” due to its backlog of 140,000 applications with around 1,600 arriving every month; a conclusion compounded by inherent delays. He suggests that the way to draw back Strasbourg from the brink of judicial Armageddon is to abolish the individual right to petition Strasbourg and to introduce a referral system whereby national courts request Strasbourg’s opinion on human rights issues, akin to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/reform-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-response-to-a-modest-proposal/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/04/reform-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-response-to-a-modest-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landmark EU Decision Against Stem Cell Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/01/landmark-eu-decision-against-stem-cell-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/01/landmark-eu-decision-against-stem-cell-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Brustle v. Greenpeace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=99880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[. . .  the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has said that stem cell procedures that require the destruction or modification of a human embryo cannot be patented . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/01/landmark-eu-decision-against-stem-cell-patents/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/04/01/landmark-eu-decision-against-stem-cell-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Court Could Rule Traditional Marriage Benefits Are Discriminatory</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/04/european-court-could-rule-traditional-marriage-benefits-are-discriminatory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/04/european-court-could-rule-traditional-marriage-benefits-are-discriminatory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Roger Kiska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=97127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.c-fam.org/publications/pub_detail.asp?id=1797">C-FAM</a>: The European Union was founded on respect for national sovereignty,” Roger Kiska, Legal Counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, told the Friday Fax. “If the Advocate General's opinion is followed, it destroys this sovereignty making all European nations vulnerable to legislation promoting anti-life and anti-family laws despite the national will of that country. It is not the role of the ECJ to legislate for all of Europe without Europe having a say in the matter," said Kiska.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/04/european-court-could-rule-traditional-marriage-benefits-are-discriminatory/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/03/04/european-court-could-rule-traditional-marriage-benefits-are-discriminatory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German court calls on European Court of Justice to clarify religious refugee status</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/german-court-calls-on-european-court-of-justice-to-clarify-religious-refugee-status/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/german-court-calls-on-european-court-of-justice-to-clarify-religious-refugee-status/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=85756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bverwg.de/enid/34e091d54db966a6381b79926c55dfa6,612b897365617263685f646973706c6179436f6e7461696e6572092d093133353035093a095f7472636964092d093133333430/Pressemitteilungen/Pressemitteilung_9d.html">Federal Administrative Court of Germany</a> [<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&#038;sl=de&#038;tl=en&#038;u=http://www.bverwg.de/enid/34e091d54db966a6381b79926c55dfa6,612b897365617263685f646973706c6179436f6e7461696e6572092d093133353035093a095f7472636964092d093133333430/Pressemitteilungen/Pressemitteilung_9d.html">Google Translation</a>]: "The Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig, by orders from today in two cases in which this is about the refugee status because of religious persecution, called [on] the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg . . . for a preliminary ruling [concerning] the interpretation of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of the European Union (Qualification Directive). This [includes] the alignment of legal conditions for the granting of refugee status within the European Union. The German legislature . . . implemented the directive in August 2007." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/german-court-calls-on-european-court-of-justice-to-clarify-religious-refugee-status/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/09/german-court-calls-on-european-court-of-justice-to-clarify-religious-refugee-status/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK tribunal rejects religious discrimination claim by adoption panel member</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/17/uk-tribunal-rejects-religious-discrimination-claim-by-adoption-panel-member/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/17/uk-tribunal-rejects-religious-discrimination-claim-by-adoption-panel-member/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=82551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://us2.campaign-archive.com/?u=bed173cc9adfcad1e0e442a35&#38;id=61c3e6c8d8&#38;e=073f2edcf5">Christian Concern</a>: "Employment Judge MacMillan held that there was no discrimination on the grounds of religion as Dr Matthews’ belief in the dangers of placing vulnerable children with same sex couples was based on scientific evidence which happened to dovetail with her Christian beliefs . . . MacMillan said Dr Matthews was not discriminated against because anyone who held the same views on homosexual parenting, of whatever religion or none, would have been treated in the same way." &#124; More from <a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/11/british-tribunal-rejects-religious.html">Religion Clause</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/17/uk-tribunal-rejects-religious-discrimination-claim-by-adoption-panel-member/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/17/uk-tribunal-rejects-religious-discrimination-claim-by-adoption-panel-member/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review: Independence and Diversity in the European Court of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/20/law-review-independence-and-diversity-in-the-european-court-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/20/law-review-independence-and-diversity-in-the-european-court-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=58482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iviola Solanke, <em>Independence and Diversity in the European Court of Justice</em> (January 1, 2009). Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 89-121, 2009. Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1592457">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1592457</a>

"The European Court of Justice (ECJ) currently comprises twenty-seven judges and eight Advocates General who together make law affecting citizens of the European Union over a wide range of social and economic issues, including racial and ethnic equality. However, the ECJ’s composition remains unreflective of the millions of black and migrant European Union citizens whom it serves. As the rulings of the Court reach into the everyday lives of an increasing number of people, the need for it to be legitimate in the eyes of all those it serves also rises. Courts derive their legitimacy from both inputs and outputs. A traditional input is independence; a more recent concern is diversity. This Article argues that the current procedure for appointments to the ECJ undermines both of these. The lack of transparency, coupled with the proximity to the national governments, undermines the independence of the members and precludes racial and ethnic minority representation at the Court. To address this problem, I suggest the development of objective eligibility criteria, the use of which, I argue, can promote both diversity and independence in the ECJ." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/20/law-review-independence-and-diversity-in-the-european-court-of-justice/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/04/20/law-review-independence-and-diversity-in-the-european-court-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sweden defies EU directive to store users&#8217; phone data</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/05/sweden-defies-eu-directive-to-store-users-phone-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/05/sweden-defies-eu-directive-to-store-users-phone-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global: Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=51028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thelocal.se/24784/20100204">TheLocal.se</a>: "The European Court of Justice has told Sweden that it must implement a 2006 measure requiring telecom operators to store information about their customers’ phone calls and emails." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/05/sweden-defies-eu-directive-to-store-users-phone-data/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/02/05/sweden-defies-eu-directive-to-store-users-phone-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking Values Seriously: Towards a Philosophy of EU Law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/16/taking-values-seriously-towards-a-philosophy-of-eu-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/16/taking-values-seriously-towards-a-philosophy-of-eu-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=42425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Trevor Williams, <em>Taking Values Seriously: Towards a Philosophy of EU Law</em> (November 11, 2009). Warwick School of Law Research. Available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1504067">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1504067</a>

"This article argues that the existing philosophy of EU law, such as it may be perceived, is flawed. Through a series of propositions it claims that EU law is infected by an underlying indeterminacy of ideal that has deeply affected the appreciation and realisation of stated values. These values, the most fundamental of which appear in Article 6(1) of the Treaty of European Union, have been applied in a haphazard fashion and without an understanding of normative content. The European Court of Justice has instead adopted a largely pragmatic approach that has focused on principles or virtues of governance rather than attempting to offer a way of satisfactorily defining values or ensuring their realisation. The underlying philosophy thus appears to be based on a theory of interpretation (of original political will) rather than a theory of justice. The recent decision in Kadi paradoxically offers both confirmation of the argument presented but also a judicial appreciation that a new direction may be desirable, one inspired by a law based on the predominance of fundamental values with particular emphasis on respect for fundamental rights." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/16/taking-values-seriously-towards-a-philosophy-of-eu-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/16/taking-values-seriously-towards-a-philosophy-of-eu-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU Court strikes blow to gambling industry</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/10/eu-court-strikes-blow-to-gambling-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/10/eu-court-strikes-blow-to-gambling-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=35710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-court-strikes-blow-gambling-industry/article-185245?Ref=RSS#">EurActiv</a>: "European Union law may allow countries to ban foreign gambling websites if the intention is to prevent criminal offences, the European Court of Justice said yesterday (8 September) in a judgement that goes against previous rulings by the Court and is sure to reverberate through the betting industry." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/10/eu-court-strikes-blow-to-gambling-industry/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/10/eu-court-strikes-blow-to-gambling-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Constitution and European Evolution: Why Does the ECJ Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/09/european-constitution-and-european-evolution-why-does-the-ecj-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/09/european-constitution-and-european-evolution-why-does-the-ecj-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country: European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legal Periodicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=14931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am going to show how the ECJ has reacted to the centrifugal judicial forces which would threaten the interpretive monopoly of the master of treaties. As we will see, the change of the perspective (from that viewpoint of the political sources of law to that of the cultural sources of law) implies a different evaluation of the current phase of EU integration and this factor allows us to overcome (partially at least) the sense of disappointment which seems to characterize the main literature currently. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/09/european-constitution-and-european-evolution-why-does-the-ecj-matter/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/02/09/european-constitution-and-european-evolution-why-does-the-ecj-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

