<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: Wisconsin Family Council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-wisconsin-family-council/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Supreme Court rules unanimously to uphold gay &#8220;marriage&#8221; ban</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-unanimously-to-uphold-gay-marriage-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-unanimously-to-uphold-gay-marriage-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McConkey v Van Hollen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-unanimously-to-uphold-gay-marriage-ban/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/jul/10070503.html">LifeSiteNews</a>: "'Voters adopted the marriage amendment in Wisconsin for one clear and simple reason: to protect the institution of marriage,' said ADF Litigation Counsel [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jim-campbell/">Jim Campbell</a>]. 'We should be strengthening - not undermining - marriage, which is one man and one woman. Once again, activists tried to use the courts to force something on the people that they have repeatedly and overwhelmingly rejected.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-unanimously-to-uphold-gay-marriage-ban/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-unanimously-to-uphold-gay-marriage-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds marriage protection amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/06/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-marriage-protection-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/06/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-marriage-protection-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McConkey v Van Hollen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/06/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-marriage-protection-amendment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-marriage-protection-amendment/">Catholic News Agency</a>: "A lawsuit challenging a Wisconsin constitutional amendment which protected the definition of marriage failed to persuade the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which unanimously rejected its arguments. ... The ADF filed an amicus brief in the case. Its litigation counsel [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jim-campbell/">Jim Campbell</a>] said in a statement that voters adopted the measure 'for one clear and simple reason: to protect the institution of marriage.' 'We should be strengthening--not undermining--marriage, which is one man and one woman. Once again, activists tried to use the courts to force something on the people that they have repeatedly and overwhelmingly rejected.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/06/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-marriage-protection-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/06/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-marriage-protection-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WI Supreme Court rejects single subject challenge to marriage amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wi-supreme-court-rejects-single-subject-challenge-to-marriage-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wi-supreme-court-rejects-single-subject-challenge-to-marriage-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McConkey v Van Hollen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=64894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newyorklawschool.typepad.com/leonardlink/2010/07/wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-single-subject-challenge-to-marriage-amendment.html">Leonard Link</a>: "The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled unanimously yesterday that the state’s anti-marriage constitutional amendment . . . does not violate the 'single subject' rule. Although this was a private voter lawsuit rather than an action instigated by LGBT public interest groups, the case attracted organization amicus briefs on both sides of the issue. ACLU and Lambda Legal and the League of Women Voters supported McConkey’s appeal, while the Wisconsin Family Council (represented by Alliance Defense Fund), and an organization calling itself 'Community Leaders Dedicated to Children Raised by Married Mothers and Fathers,' filed briefs defending the amendment." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wi-supreme-court-rejects-single-subject-challenge-to-marriage-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wi-supreme-court-rejects-single-subject-challenge-to-marriage-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Wis. high court upholds gay marriage ban&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wis-high-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wis-high-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McConkey v Van Hollen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=64790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.christianpost.com/article/20100630/wis-high-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/">Christian Post</a>: "The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a state constitutional amendment that affirms traditional marriage and bans same-sex civil unions. ... [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jim-campbell/">Jim Campbell</a>], litigation counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief last year on behalf of the Wisconsin Family Council, maintained that voters adopted the amendment 'for one clear and simple reason: to protect the institution of marriage.'" &#124; <a href="http://www.adfmedia.org/News/PRDetail/2951">ADF News Release</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wis-high-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wis-high-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds traditional marriage amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-traditional-marriage-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-traditional-marriage-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McConkey v Van Hollen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=64792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-2359-Evangelical-Examiner~y2010m6d30-Wisconsin-Supreme-Court-upholds-traditional-marriage-amendment">Evangelical Examiner</a>: "'Voters adopted the marriage amendment in Wisconsin for one clear and simple reason: to protect the institution of marriage,' said ADF Litigation Counsel [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-jim-campbell/">Jim Campbell</a>]. 'We should be strengthening--not undermining--marriage, which is one man and one woman. Once again, activists tried to use the courts to force something on the people that they have repeatedly and overwhelmingly rejected.'" &#124; <a href="http://www.adfmedia.org/News/PRDetail/2951">ADF News Release</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-traditional-marriage-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/07/01/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-traditional-marriage-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wis. Supreme Court upholds will of the people on marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/30/wis-supreme-court-upholds-will-of-the-people-on-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/30/wis-supreme-court-upholds-will-of-the-people-on-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: McConkey v Van Hollen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/30/wis-supreme-court-upholds-will-of-the-people-on-marriage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State high court unanimously thwarts attack on marriage amendment adopted by voters <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/30/wis-supreme-court-upholds-will-of-the-people-on-marriage/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/06/30/wis-supreme-court-upholds-will-of-the-people-on-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Passes “Unhealthy Youth Act” to detriment of WI youth</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/29/senate-passes-%e2%80%9cunhealthy-youth-act%e2%80%9d-to-detriment-of-wi-youth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/29/senate-passes-%e2%80%9cunhealthy-youth-act%e2%80%9d-to-detriment-of-wi-youth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=50293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thewheelerreport.com/releases/jan10/jan29/0129wifamilyactionhealthy.pdf">WI Family Action</a>: "Yesterday the Senate passed AB 458, 18-15, on party lines with all the Democrats in favor and all the Republicans opposed. The Republicans offered six amendments, only one of which the Democrats passed.  The bill would require all school districts in Wisconsin that elect to have a Human Growth and Development program, which is the vast majority of districts, to teach the misnamed 'comprehensive sex ed' approach, including the proper use of barrier methods of contraception. " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/29/senate-passes-%e2%80%9cunhealthy-youth-act%e2%80%9d-to-detriment-of-wi-youth/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/29/senate-passes-%e2%80%9cunhealthy-youth-act%e2%80%9d-to-detriment-of-wi-youth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Senate to vote on “Unhealthy Youth Act” tomorrow!</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/27/wisconsin-senate-to-vote-on-%e2%80%9cunhealthy-youth-act%e2%80%9d-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/27/wisconsin-senate-to-vote-on-%e2%80%9cunhealthy-youth-act%e2%80%9d-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/wordpress/?p=49952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://wisconsinfamilyvoice.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Wisconsin Family Voice</a> reports on Assembly Bill 458/Senate Bill 324, the so-called "Healthy Youth Act."  This bill would gut abstinence education among other things.  Wisconsin Family Action provides more information about the bill can be found <a href="https://www.wifamilyaction.org/ab458" target="_blank">here</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/27/wisconsin-senate-to-vote-on-%e2%80%9cunhealthy-youth-act%e2%80%9d-tomorrow/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/01/27/wisconsin-senate-to-vote-on-%e2%80%9cunhealthy-youth-act%e2%80%9d-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Supreme Court rejects challenge to state&#8217;s homosexual partnership law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-states-homosexual-partnership-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-states-homosexual-partnership-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=41510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/nov/09110506.html">LifeSiteNews</a>: "'This new domestic partnership scheme is precisely the type of marriage imitation that the constitutional amendment approved by Wisconsin voters was intended to prevent,' said Brian Raum, Senior Counsel in the ADF.  'Those who are determined to redefine marriage in Wisconsin are attempting an end-run assault on marriage hoping they can evade the clear language of the state constitution.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-states-homosexual-partnership-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/11/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-states-homosexual-partnership-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin: &#8220;Unhealthy Youth Act&#8221; passes in Assembly Committee; hearing scheduled in Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/28/wisconsin-unhealthy-youth-act-passes-in-assembly-committee-hearing-scheduled-in-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/28/wisconsin-unhealthy-youth-act-passes-in-assembly-committee-hearing-scheduled-in-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage & Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Sex Indoctrination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=40610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wisconsin Family Action has forwarded an email that reports:

<em><strong>"Unhealthy Youth Act" passes in Assembly Committee; hearing scheduled in Senate<strong>
</strong></strong></em>Yesterday the Assembly Education Committee voted on AB 458, the so-called "Healthy Youth Act," the bill that would require that all Wisconsin school districts that have a Human Growth &#38; Development program must teach "comprehensive sex ed."   The committee voted 8-5 in favor of the bill and also approved two amendments reinstating complete parental access to <em>all </em>curriculum and instructional materials and adding "guardian" to the provision allowing parents to opt their children out of all or part of the sex-ed program.  The bill and the amendments are now on their way to the Assembly floor for a full vote.  In the meantime, the Senate Education Committee will hold <a href="https://www.adfmail.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=cfc495209cf34a7488c8c27d4b835274&#38;URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.votervoice.net%2flink%2fclickthrough%2fext%2f74346.aspx" target="_blank">another public hearing on the senate version of this bill this Thursday, Oct. 29 at 9:30 a.m.</a> <a href="https://www.adfmail.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=cfc495209cf34a7488c8c27d4b835274&#38;URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.votervoice.net%2flink%2fclickthrough%2fext%2f74347.aspx" target="_blank"><em><strong>Click here to send an email to your state legislators asking them to vote against AB 458.</strong></em></a> <a href="https://www.adfmail.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=cfc495209cf34a7488c8c27d4b835274&#38;URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.votervoice.net%2flink%2fclickthrough%2fext%2f74348.aspx" target="_blank">For more information, click here.</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/28/wisconsin-unhealthy-youth-act-passes-in-assembly-committee-hearing-scheduled-in-senate/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/28/wisconsin-unhealthy-youth-act-passes-in-assembly-committee-hearing-scheduled-in-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin: Bill targets churches, ministries would expand statute of limitations</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/21/wisconsin-bill-targets-churches-ministries-would-expand-statute-of-limitations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/21/wisconsin-bill-targets-churches-ministries-would-expand-statute-of-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=39685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wifamilycouncil.org/">The Wisconsin Family Council</a> has issued an update that includes this alert:

<strong>***Bill that would remove all statutes of limitation for civil lawsuits in child sex-abuse cases aimed at churches &#38; must be stopped</strong>
Assembly Bill 453 is scheduled for a public hearing at 11 a.m. today, Wed., 10/21.  WFA will provide testimony and updates via Twitter and Facebook. This bill could be a disaster for churches, private schools, Christian ministries, camps, Boy Scouts, etc.  We need your help to stop this bill!  We need phone calls by the hundreds pouring into state senators and representatives asking them to vote "no" this bill.  Click here for background information.   Click here to contact your legislators.  We already know that in California, where a very similar bill was passed in late 2002, that by 2005, over 1000 lawsuits had been brought under this law, the vast majority of them against the Catholic Church.   It is important to note that because the Catholic Church is a major target right now, this in no way means that protestant churches and ministries won't also be sued under the provisions of this bill.  All churches, ministries, and organizations dealing with young people are vulnerable.  Please take some time to help with this.  Of special help is forwarding this message to your pastor and urging him to make a phone call or send an email! <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/21/wisconsin-bill-targets-churches-ministries-would-expand-statute-of-limitations/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/21/wisconsin-bill-targets-churches-ministries-would-expand-statute-of-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic partnership battle wages on in Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/28/domestic-partnership-battle-wages-on-in-wisconsin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/28/domestic-partnership-battle-wages-on-in-wisconsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=37278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20090928/GPG0101/909280508/1207/GPG01/Domestic-partnership-battle-wages-on">Green Bay Press Gazette</a>: "Lawyers representing Gov. Jim Doyle, a gay rights group and several gay couples have asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to reject a challenge to the state's new domestic partnership registry." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/28/domestic-partnership-battle-wages-on-in-wisconsin/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/28/domestic-partnership-battle-wages-on-in-wisconsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gay groups defend Wisconsin domestic-partner law&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/23/gay-groups-defend-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/23/gay-groups-defend-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=36797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/09/22/Gay_Groups_Defend_Wi__Domestic_Partner_Law/">Advocate</a>: "Lambda Legal and the American Civil Liberties Union are seeking to intervene on behalf of Fair Wisconsin and five same-sex couples in a lawsuit attempting to end newly enacted domestic-partnership protections for same-sex couples in the state . . . [A]ntigay group Wisconsin Family Action, in partnership with the Alliance Defense Fund, filed a lawsuit claiming that the registry violates the state’s constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and civil unions, which was approved by voters in 2006." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/23/gay-groups-defend-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/23/gay-groups-defend-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin: Groups seek to defend domestic partner law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-groups-seek-to-defend-domestic-partner-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-groups-seek-to-defend-domestic-partner-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=36638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.winonadailynews.com/news/state-and-regional/wi/article_101a6752-a730-11de-b6b9-001cc4c002e0.html">Winona Daily News (AP)</a>: "A gay rights group will ask the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday to reject a lawsuit that seeks to invalidate the state’s new domestic partnership law . . . Jim Campbell, a lawyer for the Alliance Defense Fund, which is representing the plaintiffs, said he is not surprised by the attempt to intervene. He said it was too early to know whether the plaintiffs will oppose it." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-groups-seek-to-defend-domestic-partner-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-groups-seek-to-defend-domestic-partner-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin: &#8220;Gay rights group fights lawsuit to invalidate domestic partnership law&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-gay-rights-group-fights-lawsuit-to-invalidate-domestic-partnership-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-gay-rights-group-fights-lawsuit-to-invalidate-domestic-partnership-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=36636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/60225662.html">TMJ 4 (AP)</a>: "A gay rights group will ask the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday to reject a lawsuit that seeks to invalidate the state’s new domestic partnership law . . . Jim Campbell, a lawyer for the Alliance Defense Fund, which is representing the plaintiffs, said he is not surprised by the attempt to intervene. He said it was too early to know whether the plaintiffs will oppose it." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-gay-rights-group-fights-lawsuit-to-invalidate-domestic-partnership-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-gay-rights-group-fights-lawsuit-to-invalidate-domestic-partnership-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin: &#8220;State group seeks to defend domestic partner law&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-state-group-seeks-to-defend-domestic-partner-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-state-group-seeks-to-defend-domestic-partner-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=36634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thenorthwestern.com/article/20090922/OSH0101/90922027/1987">The Northwester (AP)</a>: "A gay rights group will ask the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday to reject a lawsuit that seeks to invalidate the state’s new domestic partnership law . . . Jim Campbell, a lawyer for the Alliance Defense Fund, which is representing the plaintiffs, said he is not surprised by the attempt to intervene. He said it was too early to know whether the plaintiffs will oppose it." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-state-group-seeks-to-defend-domestic-partner-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/09/22/wisconsin-state-group-seeks-to-defend-domestic-partner-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The importance of Wisconsin&#8217;s domestic registry law&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/26/the-importance-of-wisconsins-domestic-registry-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/26/the-importance-of-wisconsins-domestic-registry-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=34336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://prop8legalcommentary.blogspot.com/2009/08/another-post-on-importance-of.html">Proposition 8 and the Right to Marry</a>: "On August 21st, Wisconsin Attorney General J.B Van Hollen announced his decision not to defend Wisconsin's new domestic registry law in Appling v. Doyle (Wis. Supreme Court Case No. 2009AP001860) . . . The nation's leading Christian legal advocacy group, the Alliance Defense Fund, has defended super DOMA amendments against the perceived inroads that these laws represent. It represents Wisconsin Family Action in the Appling lawsuit, and recently filed a lawsuit to defend Ohio's super DOMA amendment." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/26/the-importance-of-wisconsins-domestic-registry-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/26/the-importance-of-wisconsins-domestic-registry-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Wis. attorney general won&#8217;t defend law providing gay, lesbian couples spousal rights&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/21/wis-attorney-general-wont-defend-law-providing-gay-lesbian-couples-spousal-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/21/wis-attorney-general-wont-defend-law-providing-gay-lesbian-couples-spousal-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=33900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-us-domestic-partnerships,0,4221253.story">Los Angeles Times</a>: "Wisconsin's attorney general said Friday he will not defend a new law that grants same-sex couples spousal benefits such as hospital visitation and inheritance, saying lawmakers went against voters' decision not to extend such privileges . . . Attorney Brian Raum, who is representing the conservative group, said Van Hollen's decision strengthens the group's case. 'I certainly think it helps,' he said. 'The attorney general's opinion in regard to the registry's unconstitutionality may be a positive factor in helping the court to make a decision on this.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/21/wis-attorney-general-wont-defend-law-providing-gay-lesbian-couples-spousal-rights/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/21/wis-attorney-general-wont-defend-law-providing-gay-lesbian-couples-spousal-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Wisconsin LGBTs confident of court victory for domestic partnerships&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/07/wisconsin-lgbts-confident-of-court-victory-for-domestic-partnerships/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/07/wisconsin-lgbts-confident-of-court-victory-for-domestic-partnerships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Lambda Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=32383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&#038;sc=&#038;sc2=news&#038;sc3=&#038;id=94728">EDGE</a>: "The WFA, fronted by president Julaine Appling, filed the petition with the Supreme Court on July 23. Appling, along with representatives from the First Freedoms Foundation and Alliance Defense Fund, claim the registry undermines marriage." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/07/wisconsin-lgbts-confident-of-court-victory-for-domestic-partnerships/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/07/wisconsin-lgbts-confident-of-court-victory-for-domestic-partnerships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin domestic partnerships begin, as does legal challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/05/wisconsin-domestic-partnerships-begin-as-does-legal-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/05/wisconsin-domestic-partnerships-begin-as-does-legal-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=32247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.everydaychristian.com/features/story/4037/">Everyday Christian</a>: "With the help of the conservative legal advocacy organization Alliance Defense Fund, Wisconsin Family Action has filed a petition at the state Supreme Court to have the laws struck down."
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/05/wisconsin-domestic-partnerships-begin-as-does-legal-challenge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/05/wisconsin-domestic-partnerships-begin-as-does-legal-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Despite suit, gay partner law begins in Wisconsin&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/despite-suit-gay-partner-law-begins-in-wisconsin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/despite-suit-gay-partner-law-begins-in-wisconsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=31842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=4316&#038;MediaType=1&#038;Category=26">On Top Magazine</a>: "The group Wisconsin Family Action (WFA) and the Christian-based Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) are challenging the registry, arguing that is it prohibited by the state's constitutional ban on gay marriage approved by voters in 2006. WFA supported the passage of the anti-gay marriage amendment as the Family Research Institute." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/despite-suit-gay-partner-law-begins-in-wisconsin/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/despite-suit-gay-partner-law-begins-in-wisconsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic partnership registry opens Monday despite lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/domestic-partnership-registry-opens-monday-despite-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/domestic-partnership-registry-opens-monday-despite-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=31836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.winonadailynews.com/articles/2009/08/02/news/04partners.txt">Winona Daily News</a>: "Monday will be the first day same-sex couples in Wisconsin can register domestic partnerships, which will grant them 43 of the more than 200 rights afforded to married couples. . . . 'The new domestic partnership scheme is precisely the type of marriage imitation that the constitutional amendment approved by Wisconsin voters was intended to prevent,' said Brian Raum, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, which is representing the plaintiffs." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/domestic-partnership-registry-opens-monday-despite-lawsuit/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/08/03/domestic-partnership-registry-opens-monday-despite-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin: Domestic partnerships begin August 3rd</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/31/wisconsin-domestic-partnerships-begin-august-3rd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/31/wisconsin-domestic-partnerships-begin-august-3rd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=31695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nbc15.com/newsyoucanuse/headlines/52000477.html#">NBC-15 Madison (includes video)</a>: "'The will of the people, the institution of marriage and the constitution all need to be defended,' says Julaine Appling, Executive Director of the Wisconsin Family Council. They have filed a lawsuit with the state Supreme Court asking them to declare the registry unconstitutional." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/31/wisconsin-domestic-partnerships-begin-august-3rd/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/31/wisconsin-domestic-partnerships-begin-august-3rd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisc. governor skirts marriage amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/27/wisc-governor-skirts-marriage-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/27/wisc-governor-skirts-marriage-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=31054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=617630">OneNewsNow</a>: "'The domestic partnership law clearly violates Wisconsin's marriage amendment, which precludes any kind of legal status which is substantially similar to marriage,' [Raum] explains. 'And the way that the law reads, it creates a legal status that in almost every way is an attempt to mirror marriage.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/27/wisc-governor-skirts-marriage-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/27/wisc-governor-skirts-marriage-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Eau Claire lesbian couple upbeat about new domestic partnership law&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/27/eau-claire-lesbian-couple-upbeat-about-new-domestic-partnership-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/27/eau-claire-lesbian-couple-upbeat-about-new-domestic-partnership-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=31052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Dowd <a href="http://www.leadertelegram.com/story-news.asp?id=BKLS8DGDL3M">reports in the <em>Leader-Telegram</em></a>: "'What the Legislature has done is a direct challenge to the will of the people and the marriage amendment,' said Jim Campbell, a lawyer at the Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund, a nonprofit organization that takes up religious liberty cases." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/27/eau-claire-lesbian-couple-upbeat-about-new-domestic-partnership-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/27/eau-claire-lesbian-couple-upbeat-about-new-domestic-partnership-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit challenges Wisconsin same-sex &#8220;domestic partner&#8221; scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/lawsuit-challenges-wisconsin-same-sex-domestic-partner-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/lawsuit-challenges-wisconsin-same-sex-domestic-partner-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=31023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jul/09072404.html">LifeSiteNews reports</a>: "'This new domestic partnership scheme is precisely the type of marriage imitation that the constitutional amendment approved by Wisconsin voters was intended to prevent,' [Raum] continued. 'Those who are determined to redefine marriage in Wisconsin are attempting an end-run assault on marriage hoping they can evade the clear language of the state constitution.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/lawsuit-challenges-wisconsin-same-sex-domestic-partner-scheme/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/lawsuit-challenges-wisconsin-same-sex-domestic-partner-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Group challenges constitutionality of Wisconsin domestic partner law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/group-challenges-constitutionality-of-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/group-challenges-constitutionality-of-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shawn Johnson <a href="http://www.superiortelegram.com/event/article/id/36328/group/News/">reports in the <em>Superior Telegram</em></a>: "Brian Raum is an attorney with the national group Alliance Defense Fund, which is bringing the lawsuit. He says the new law creates a legal status that’s substantially similar to marriage." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/group-challenges-constitutionality-of-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/group-challenges-constitutionality-of-wisconsin-domestic-partner-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WI: Challenge to benefits for domestic partners</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/wi-challenge-to-benefits-for-domestic-partners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/wi-challenge-to-benefits-for-domestic-partners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Jim Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Angileri <a href="http://www.wkowtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=10782108">reports at WKOWTV</a>: "'Politicians should not pass laws that violate the will of Wisconsin voters,' said Jim Campbell, of Alliance Defense Fund, which represents Wisconsin Family Action. 'This is more than just an issue of marriage or creating a marriage substitute or marriage imitation.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/wi-challenge-to-benefits-for-domestic-partners/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/wi-challenge-to-benefits-for-domestic-partners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WI: Groups challenge domestic partnerships as unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/wi-groups-challenge-domestic-partnerships-as-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/wi-groups-challenge-domestic-partnerships-as-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stacy Forster <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/51488957.html">reports in the <em>Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel</em></a>: "Wisconsin Family Action board members Jerry Hiller and E. Lee Webster joined Appling in filing the suit. Rather than initiating the suit in a lower court, the group went directly to the Supreme Court, calling it the "most expeditious and efficient" way to resolve the issue. Brian Raum, senior counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund representing Appling and the others, said the group hopes the court would act quickly." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/wi-groups-challenge-domestic-partnerships-as-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/24/wi-groups-challenge-domestic-partnerships-as-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage amendment defended in Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/marriage-amendment-defended-in-wisconsin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/marriage-amendment-defended-in-wisconsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000010563.cfm">CitizenLink</a>: "Wisconsin Family Action, with the help of the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), has taken the extraordinary step of filing a lawsuit with the state Supreme Court to stop the governor and Legislature from violating the state's marriage amendment . . . 'Politicians shouldn't be trying to skirt the will of voters who legitimately amended the Wisconsin Constitution in a fair election,' ADF Senior Counsel Brian Raum said." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/marriage-amendment-defended-in-wisconsin/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/marriage-amendment-defended-in-wisconsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin: Lawsuit filed against domestic partnerships</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/wisconsin-lawsuit-filed-against-domestic-partnerships/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/wisconsin-lawsuit-filed-against-domestic-partnerships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Beckett <a href="http://www.wrn.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=A8B36826-5056-B82A-37D0F8A544E3CCBD">reports at Wisconsin Radio Network</a>: "The group is being represented by the Alliance Defense Fund in the lawsuit. Attorney Brian Raum says the domestic partnership law challenges the will of Wisconsin voters, who passed a clear Constitutional amendment defining marriage and preventing any similar legal status." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/wisconsin-lawsuit-filed-against-domestic-partnerships/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/wisconsin-lawsuit-filed-against-domestic-partnerships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Foes sue over gay partner law in Wisconsin&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/foes-sue-over-gay-partner-law-in-wisconsin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/foes-sue-over-gay-partner-law-in-wisconsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carlos Santoscoy <a href="http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=4248&#038;MediaType=1&#038;Category=26">reports at On Top Magazine</a>: "The group Wisconsin Family Action (WFA), which supported passage of the anti-gay marriage amendment as the Family Research Institute, and the Christian-based Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) announced Thursday they would join forces to fight Governor Jim Doyle's domestic partnership registry." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/foes-sue-over-gay-partner-law-in-wisconsin/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/foes-sue-over-gay-partner-law-in-wisconsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Urgent lawsuit filed with Wis. Supreme Court to stop violation of marriage amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/urgent-lawsuit-filed-with-wis-supreme-court-to-stop-violation-of-marriage-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/urgent-lawsuit-filed-with-wis-supreme-court-to-stop-violation-of-marriage-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“This new domestic partnership scheme is precisely the type of marriage imitation that the constitutional amendment approved by Wisconsin voters was intended to prevent." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/urgent-lawsuit-filed-with-wis-supreme-court-to-stop-violation-of-marriage-amendment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/urgent-lawsuit-filed-with-wis-supreme-court-to-stop-violation-of-marriage-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit challenges Wis. domestic partnership law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/lawsuit-challenges-wis-domestic-partnership-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/lawsuit-challenges-wis-domestic-partnership-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://wcco.com/wireapnewswi/Lawsuit.asks.Wisconsin.2.1097788.html">Associated Press</a>: "'This new domestic partnership scheme is precisely the type of marriage imitation that the constitutional amendment approved by Wisconsin voters was intended to prevent,' said lawyer Brian Raum of the Alliance Defense Fund, who is representing them. 'Those who are determined to redefine marriage in Wisconsin are attempting an end-run assault on marriage hoping they can evade the clear language of the state constitution.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/lawsuit-challenges-wis-domestic-partnership-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/lawsuit-challenges-wis-domestic-partnership-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Family Action asks WI Supreme Court to declare Gov. Doyle’s statewide, same-sex domestic partnership registry unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/wisconsin-family-action-asks-wi-supreme-court-to-declare-gov-doyle%e2%80%99s-statewide-same-sex-domestic-partnership-registry-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/wisconsin-family-action-asks-wi-supreme-court-to-declare-gov-doyle%e2%80%99s-statewide-same-sex-domestic-partnership-registry-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Brian Raum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Wisconsin Family Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=30863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=165236">Wisconsin Family Action Press Release</a>: "'The registry is precisely the type of marriage imitation that the constitutional amendment approved by Wisconsin voters was intended to prevent,' said ADF Senior Counsel Brian Raum. 'Those who wish to redefine marriage are attempting to evade the clear language of the state constitution.'" <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/wisconsin-family-action-asks-wi-supreme-court-to-declare-gov-doyle%e2%80%99s-statewide-same-sex-domestic-partnership-registry-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/07/23/wisconsin-family-action-asks-wi-supreme-court-to-declare-gov-doyle%e2%80%99s-statewide-same-sex-domestic-partnership-registry-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

