<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; Group: World Vision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/group-world-vision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Amended opinion issued, en banc review denied, in World Vision case</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/amended-opinion-issued-en-banc-review-denied-in-world-vision-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/amended-opinion-issued-en-banc-review-denied-in-world-vision-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: World Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Spencer v. World Vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=93505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2011/01/amended-opinion-issued-en-banc-review.html">Religion Clause</a>: "Yesterday, a panel of the 9th Circuit issued an amended opinion and denied an <em>en banc</em> rehearing in <em><a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/25/08-35532.pdf">Spencer v. World Vision, Inc.</a>,</em> (9th Cir., Jan. 25, 2011). At issue is whether the Christian humanitarian organization, World Vision, comes within the exemption in Title VII  . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/amended-opinion-issued-en-banc-review-denied-in-world-vision-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/26/amended-opinion-issued-en-banc-review-denied-in-world-vision-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When religious freedom and equal opportunity employment laws collide</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/15/when-religious-freedom-and-equal-opportunity-employment-laws-collide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/15/when-religious-freedom-and-equal-opportunity-employment-laws-collide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: World Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Spencer v. World Vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=81964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.patriciakanewilliams.com/healthcare-and-affordable-housing/when-religious-freedom-and-equal-employment-opportunity-laws-collide/">Law Office of Patricia Kane Williams, LLC</a>: "This summer a divided Ninth Circuit held that World Vision, a noted humanitarian organization, could terminate employees on account of their religious beliefs. Although approved for publication, the case offers little guidance because each member of the three-judge panel provided a different analysis for his or her conclusion . . . As is to be expected for a case raising such hot issues, numerous organizations, such as the U.S. Department of Justice, the Christian Legal Society, Alliance Defense Fund, Association for Christian Schools International, etc., appeared as <em>amici curiae</em>." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/15/when-religious-freedom-and-equal-opportunity-employment-laws-collide/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/11/15/when-religious-freedom-and-equal-opportunity-employment-laws-collide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaigning for the Manhattan Declaration</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/campaigning-for-the-manhattan-declaration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/campaigning-for-the-manhattan-declaration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Alan E. Sears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Evangelicals for Social Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Focus on the Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Association of Evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference (NHCLC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Prison Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Sojourners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: World Vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=74625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/octoberweb-only/49-52.0.html?start=2">Christianity Today</a>: "A group of charities, colleges, and churches wrote a letter to the Senate which stated that they opposed efforts to 'dilute the right of faith-based social service organizations to stay faith-based through their hiring' . . . The Alliance Defense Fund also took on the issue of religious liberty through its third annual 'Pulpit Freedom Sunday' . . . 'The question at stake is: Who should decide what is preached from the pulpit? Government bureaucrats and regulators, or the church and its leadership?' asked  ADF president [<a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-alan-e-sears/">Alan Sears</a>]." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/campaigning-for-the-manhattan-declaration/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/10/01/campaigning-for-the-manhattan-declaration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninth Circuit protects para-church ministries – really!</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/31/ninth-circuit-protects-para-church-ministries-%e2%80%93-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/31/ninth-circuit-protects-para-church-ministries-%e2%80%93-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Kevin Theriot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: World Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Spencer v. World Vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=70807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF Attorney <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-kevin-theriot/">Kevin Theriot</a> writing at <a href="http://blog.speakupmovement.org/church/church-governance/ninth-circuit-protects-para-church-ministries-really/">Speak Up Movement / Church</a>: "This decision [in <em>Spence v. World Vision</em>] brings the Ninth Circuit in line with several others such as the Eleventh in Atlanta and the Third in Philadelphia. What's remarkable is the court went even further than its sister circuits when making this ruling. For instance, in holding that World Vision falls under the Title VII’s exemption for religious organizations, the court said that the First Amendment would require such an exemption, even if Title VII didn’t provide for it. It’s encouraging to know that even if Congress attempts to narrow the law to only apply to churches, para-church ministries like World Vision are still protected by the Constitution." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/31/ninth-circuit-protects-para-church-ministries-%e2%80%93-really/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/31/ninth-circuit-protects-para-church-ministries-%e2%80%93-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greg Baylor: Are you sitting down? 9th Circuit delivers favorable religious freedom decision</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/greg-baylor-are-you-sitting-down-9th-circuit-delivers-favorable-religious-freedom-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/greg-baylor-are-you-sitting-down-9th-circuit-delivers-favorable-religious-freedom-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADF in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Gregory S. Baylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADF: Media Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Christian Legal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: World Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Spencer v. World Vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=70477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADF Attorney <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/03/01/about-gregory-s-baylor/">Gregory S. Baylor</a> writing at <a href="http://blog.speakupmovement.org/university/freedom-of-association/are-you-sitting-down/">Speak Up Movement / University</a>: "Yes, believe it or not, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has issued a <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/08/23/08-35532.pdf">favorable religious freedom decision</a>. On Monday, the court held that <a href="http://www.worldvision.org/">World Vision </a>is in fact a religious organization and thus allowed to fire three employees who had repudiated the Christian beliefs they once held." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/greg-baylor-are-you-sitting-down-9th-circuit-delivers-favorable-religious-freedom-decision/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/27/greg-baylor-are-you-sitting-down-9th-circuit-delivers-favorable-religious-freedom-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups protest ban on religion-based hiring in proposed SAMHSA legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/26/groups-protest-ban-on-religion-based-hiring-in-proposed-samhsa-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/26/groups-protest-ban-on-religion-based-hiring-in-proposed-samhsa-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: World Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=70363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/08/groups-protest-ban-on-religion-based.html">Religion Clause</a>: "Today's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/26/us/26religion.html?partner=rss&#38;emc=rss">New York Times</a> and a <a href="http://www.worldvision.org/content.nsf/about/20100825-religious-leaders-to-congress">press release</a> from World Vision report that over 100 religious organizations have  written to every member of Congress objecting to a provision in<a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&#38;docid=f:h5466ih.txt.pdf"> HR 5466</a>,  the proposed SAMHSA Modernization Act of 2010 reauthorizing the  Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.  At issue is a  provision (Sec. 501(m)(2)) that would prevent grant recipients under  the Act from hiring on the basis of religion." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/26/groups-protest-ban-on-religion-based-hiring-in-proposed-samhsa-legislation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/26/groups-protest-ban-on-religion-based-hiring-in-proposed-samhsa-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

