Religion Clause Blog: In Fishers Adolescent Catholic Enrichment Society, Inc. ["FACES"] v. Bridgewater, (IN Ct. App., May 29, 2013), an Indiana appeals court affirmed most of the decision of an administrative law judge in a suit brought by the Indiana Civil Rights Commission against FACES, a non-profit group created to provide enrichment opportunities for home schooled children.
- Posted: 05/31/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Fishers Adolescent Catholic Enrichment Society (FACES) v. Indiana Civil Rights Commission
Patheos: Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Gregory S. Baylor, whose organization argued for the constitutionality of the program, defended it on the grounds that “parents should be able to choose what’s best for their own children.” “The ultimate winners in the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision are Indiana families who want to provide the best education for their children, whether it is public or private,” Baylor said March 26.
- Posted: 05/14/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.patheos.com
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
DFW Catholic: Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Gregory S. Baylor, whose organization argued for the constitutionality of the program, defended it on the grounds that “parents should be able to choose what’s best for their own children.” “The ultimate winners in the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision are Indiana families who want to provide the best education for their children, whether it is public or private,” Baylor said March 26.
- Posted: 05/10/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.dfwcatholic.org
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
Alan Sears at the Christian Post: The fight to preserve the sanctity of life in America requires tireless prayer, vigilance, and determination – and, more and more, that your Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys take on the formidable legal and political juggernaut that is Planned Parenthood.
- Posted: 04/11/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blogs.christianpost.com
- Tags: ADF: Alan E. Sears, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Steven H. Aden, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Americans for Tax Reform, Group: Planned Parenthood, Group: Susan B. Anthony List, State: Indiana, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Insurance, ZZ: Secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana, ZZADF: 34447
Indian Congressman Marlin Stutzman has issued this press release that includes this: “Regardless of any ruling, referendum, or law, marriage is the union of one man and one woman,” said Stutzman. “Washington cannot redefine marriage any more than it can govern gravity. As the cornerstone of society throughout history, marriage is a unique institution and the safest environment for raising children. My commitment to marriage is matched by my abiding commitment to the civil rights of all individuals—every American must be treated with dignity and respect. However, marriage is neither a civil right nor a political platform . . . ”
- Posted: 04/04/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: stutzman.house.gov
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, State: Indiana, Topic: Congress, Topic: Culture, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Politics
Alan Sears at Alliance Defending Freedom: One of the quieter – though equally intense – battles for religious freedom in America is being fought almost daily on behalf of young school children. This week, two cases from two different parts of the country spotlight the obstacles being placed before people of faith, like you, who want nothing more than to select a school that best meets the needs of their children and grandchildren.
- Posted: 04/02/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.alliancedefendingfreedom.org
- Tags: ADF: Alan E. Sears, ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, State: Montana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZ: Wilson v. Montana Office of Public Instruction, ZZADF: 34856, ZZADF: 39076
Wall Street Journal (via Google): “We find it inconceivable,” the justices wrote, that the framers meant to prohibit government spending from which a religious institution could ultimately benefit. Everything from police protection to city sidewalks benefit religious institutions, but “the primary beneficiary is the public,” and any benefits to religious groups are “ancillary and indirect,” said the ruling. “The direct beneficiaries under the voucher program are the families of eligible students and not the schools selected by the parents for their children to attend.”
- Posted: 03/27/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
AP: The Indiana Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the law creating the nation’s broadest school voucher program, clearing the way for a possible expansion.
- Posted: 03/26/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, ADF: Press Releases, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Vouchers, ZZ: Meredith v. Daniels, ZZ: Meredith v. Pence, ZZADF: 34856
Religion Clause Blog: Yesterday in Grote Industries, LLC v. Sebelius, (SD IN, Dec. 27, 2012), an Indiana federal district court refused to grant a preliminary injunction to a for-profit business that manufactures vehicle safety systems and its Catholic owners who claim that their religious liberty rights are infringed by the contraceptive coverage mandate under the Affordable Care Act.
- Posted: 12/31/2012
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Indiana, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Grote Industries v. Sebelius
Religion Clause Blog: In Center for Inquiry v. Marion Circuit Court, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170243 (SD IN, Nov. 30, 2012), an Indiana federal district court rejected constitutional challenges to Indiana’s marriage solemnization statute (IN Code 31-11-6-1). Under the statute, clergy can obtain a license to solemnize marriages, but those certified as “Secular Celebrants” by the non-religious Center for Inquiry cannot.
- Posted: 12/03/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Indiana, Topic: Marriage
Steven Aden appeared with an ACLU attorney and hosts Bob Zaltsberg & Mary Catherine Carmichael on Indiana Public Media Noon Edition (WFIU) to discuss a recent 7th circuit ruling. | MP3 audio 50:42 mins
- Posted: 11/05/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Featured, Court: 7th Circuit, Group: Alliance Defense Fund, Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), Group: Planned Parenthood, Group: Thomas More Society, State: Indiana, Topic: Socialism, ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Indiana Dept. of Health, ZZADF: 34447
Baptist Press: A pro-life lawyer criticized the decision. “The will of Indiana taxpayers to close loopholes so that their money isn’t used to fund the operations of abortion sellers should be respected,” said Steven Aden, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, in a written statement. “During these tough economic times, it makes no sense to contradict the will of the people of Indiana, who don’t believe abortionists deserve to receive government funding.”
- Posted: 10/24/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.bpnews.net
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Steven H. Aden, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Sanctity of Life, Court: 7th Circuit, Group: Arizona Right to Life, Group: Center for Arizona Policy, Group: Planned Parenthood, Group: Susan B. Anthony List, State: Arizona, State: Indiana, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Socialism, ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Indiana Dept. of Health, ZZ: Planned Parenthood v. Betlach, ZZADF: 34447, ZZADF: 38362
“The will of Indiana taxpayers to close loopholes so that their money isn’t used to fund the operations of abortion sellers should be respected. During these tough economic times, it makes no sense to contradict the will of the people of Indiana, who don’t believe abortionists deserve to receive government funding.”
- Posted: 10/23/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Press Releases, Category: Featured, Court: 7th Circuit, Group: Alliance Defense Fund, Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), Group: Planned Parenthood, Group: Thomas More Society, State: Indiana, Topic: Socialism, ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Indiana Dept. of Health, ZZADF: 34447
Washington Post (AP): A federal appeals court has ruled that Indiana can’t cut off funding for Planned Parenthood just because the organization provides abortions. | ACLU press release | Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Indiana Dept. of Health | LifeNews: Appeals Court Says Indiana Can’t De-Fund Planned Parenthood – “Three pro-life legal groups have weighed in on the case— including the American Center for Law and Justice, Alliance Defense Fund and Thomas More Society — and they have said the law is constitutional.”
- Posted: 10/23/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Featured, Court: 7th Circuit, Group: Alliance Defense Fund, Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), Group: Planned Parenthood, Group: Thomas More Society, State: Indiana, Topic: Socialism, ZZ: Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Indiana Dept. of Health, ZZADF: 34447
|

Latest Posts
-
www.guardian.co.uk
06/19/2013
Heather Long at The Guardian: That is part of the grand experiment of America. But so is the ability to practice religion. Simply striking it entirely from our legislatures doesn’t honor the many faith traditions who have come to this nation seeking religious freedom.
-
www.nationalreview.com
06/19/2013
Ryan T. Anderson at National Review: A hallmark of democratic self-government is that the people should discuss, debate, and vote on important policy matters. And in America their votes should count, except when they clearly violate the people’s more settled will as expressed in the U.S. Constitution. Where the Constitution is silent, the task of a conscientious judge is to respect the constitutional authority of citizens and their elected officials . . . To fill this void, the Heritage Foundation has worked with our allies at the Alliance Defending Freedom, the Family Research Council, and the National Organization for Marriage to produce a pamphlet using everyday language to explain, in Q&A style, why marriage matters. (You can download a free e-book at TheMarriageFacts.com.)
-
www.latimes.com
06/19/2013
LA Times: New York Muslims have filed a federal lawsuit against the New York Police Department over the department’s surveillance of Muslims, which they called invasive and unconstitutional.

|