Christian Post: After reports suggested the federal government is considering becoming party to the Prop. 8 case, Austin R. Nimocks, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, who is a co-counsel in the case, told The Christian Post in a phone interview that his group will hold off on commenting on such a brief until, or if, it is actually filed. However, he shared his hopes that the Supreme Court justices will not change the traditional definition of marriage. “The wisest course of action is for the Supreme Court to allow the debate over marriage to continue in this country and not judicially impose same-sex marriage on Americans,” Nimocks said.
- Posted: 02/25/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.christianpost.com
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 33121
Heritage Foundation: President Obama has so many flip-flops in his policy positions that it’s hard to keep track. After running for President supporting traditional marriage, he “evolved” to support same-sex marriage—and now his Justice Department has officially urged the Supreme Court to overthrow the law of the land.
- Posted: 02/25/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Docs: Briefs, Group: Heritage Foundation, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 33121
Robert Oscar Lopez at American Thinker: For all the talk of being inclusive, same-sex marriage proponents are actually promoting the exclusion of one biological parent from the custody of their own children. In other words, a man’s right to marry another man is actually a man’s right to exclude the woman who bore his child from the household where the child grows up. While utterly offensive to me, this is apparently perfectly legitimate reasoning to many readers who feel that adults have rights to children if they have the money or political clout to come into possession of them, while children have no rights to anything at all.
- Posted: 02/25/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.americanthinker.com
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
Baptist Press: What has happened in America? It seems that political correctness has become a religion — an idol — in America. Everyone who does not embrace all beliefs — including sexual and religious — as equal is to be vilified and shamed. And if a person does not repent of their intolerance, he or she is to be shunned and ostracized. By canceling his appearance at First Dallas, Tim Tebow has, for now, appeased the priests and priestesses of political correctness. It seems one movement’s “tolerance” is just an excuse to exercise its own intolerance.
- Posted: 02/22/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.bpnews.net
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Religious Liberty, Topic: Culture, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Media
ChristianNews.net: According to Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which is at the forefront of the cases currently before the court, attorney generals from 19 states have filed joint briefs with the Supreme Court in favor of marriage remaining between a man and woman, and at least four legal organizations discussed the religious liberty concerns that the legalization of homosexual “marriage” would raise.
- Posted: 02/22/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: christiannews.net
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Department of Justice, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 26561, ZZADF: 33121
Business Week: “A man cannot enter into the state of marriage as defined with another man just as a woman cannot enter into the state of marriage with another woman,” the judge wrote. “The redress for these circumstances lies in the political and not the legal arena.” . . . Sex discrimination depends on a comparison between the treatment of the person of one sex with the treatment of the opposite sex, Jagot wrote in her ruling. “There cannot be discrimination by reason of the sex of a person because in all cases the treatment of the person of the opposite sex is the same,” she wrote.| Margan v President, Australian Human Rights Commission [2013] FCA 109
- Posted: 02/22/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Featured, Category: Global, Country: Australia, Global: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Margan v. President Australian Human Rights Commission
Christian Post: Austin R. Nimocks, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, who is a co-counsel in the case in favor of upholding Prop. 8, told The Christian Post in a phone interview on Thursday that ADF will hold off on commenting on such a brief until, or if, it is actually filed. However, he shared his hopes that the Supreme Court justices will not change the traditional definition of marriage. “The wisest course of action is for the Supreme Court to allow the debate over marriage to continue in this country and not judicially impose same-sex marriage on Americans,” Nimocks told CP.
- Posted: 02/22/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: global.christianpost.com
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 26561, ZZADF: 33121
The wisest course is for the Supreme Court to resist demands to prematurely end the national debate over the future of marriage. Californians and Congress voted for marriage, and the court should respect the freedom to affirm society’s fundamental building block.
- Posted: 02/21/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Press Releases, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Featured, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Star Herald (AP): “There’s a critical mass of states that have spoken out and believe states should continue to have the right to define marriage as between one man and one woman,” said Jim Campbell, legal counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which represents supporters of Proposition 8. [This AP report is widely distributed]
- Posted: 02/21/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.starherald.com
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Department of Justice, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Obama, Topic: White House, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Pink News: “There’s a critical mass of states that have spoken out and believe states should continue to have the right to define marriage as between one man and one woman,” said Jim Campbell of the anti-equal marriage Alliance Defending Freedom.
- Posted: 02/21/2013
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Washington Post: “There’s a critical mass of states that have spoken out and believe states should continue to have the right to define marriage as between one man and one woman,” said Jim Campbell, legal counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which represents supporters of Proposition 8.
- Posted: 02/21/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.washingtonpost.com
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Department of Justice, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Liberty Counsel: California ban on change therapy (SB 1172), which would ban any counseling to minors seeking to diminish or eliminate unwanted same-sex sexual attractions, behavior, or identity. On December 21, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Pickup v. Brown granted Liberty Counsel’s emergency motion to temporarily block the law from going into effect on January 1, 2013, as scheduled.
- Posted: 02/20/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.lc.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Liberty Counsel, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Pickup v. Brown
Doug Napier at Townhall: Today, homosexual activists have tried to co-opt the allusion to slavery to advance their demand to redefine marriage to include same-sex couples. Nice try, but if Lincoln were chiming in, he would undoubtedly bring up Euclid. A union of two men or two women is not the same as the union of one man and one woman, and all the rhetorical sleights of hand can’t change that biological and social reality. It’s one of those “self-evident truths” Lincoln referenced.
- Posted: 02/19/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Media
Austin R. Nimocks at Washington Examiner (2/16): By making a constitutional claim for a new federal definition of marriage, Windsor is asking the Constitution that binds all of us to impose her view of marriage upon everyone. If the U.S. Constitution is interpreted to require same-sex marriage, it doesn’t require it in one place and not another. The U.S. Constitution will require it everywhere. So much for Section 2 of DOMA.
- Posted: 02/19/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: washingtonexaminer.com
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 33121
One News Now: Ken Klukowski, a senior legal analyst for The American Civil Rights Union (ACRU), explains how that would happen. “The argument that’s being raised there is if there is no standing at the Supreme Court, then there was no standing at the Ninth Circuit, and, in fact, there was no standing in U.S. District Court — that the whole case has to be stricken entirely off the books,” he details.
- Posted: 02/19/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: onenewsnow.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Mercury News: On a May day in 2009, Vaughn Walker was going through one of his weekly routines as a federal judge, reviewing a stack of new lawsuits assigned to his San Francisco chambers, when one case caught his eye: Perry v. Schwarzenegger.
- Posted: 02/19/2013
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.mercurynews.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Reuters: As the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to take up same-sex marriage next month, laws barring recognition of such unions are not the only issue hanging in the balance. The very question of whether gay people constitute a vulnerable group that needs the court’s help in asserting equal rights is also at stake.
- Posted: 02/19/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.reuters.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 26561, ZZADF: 33121
KTAR.com (2/14): “There is a potential concern for businesses that have offices in multiple cities across our state to have unequal enforcement of the law throughout our state,” Legal Consultant Joseph La Rue, with the Alliance Defending Freedom said. La Rue said the new proposals may make hiring decisions difficult for multi-city companies. The Alliance Defending Freedom is a nonprofit religious rights group dedicated to defending religious freedom, marriage and family, and pro-life issues. La Rue also opposed the new proposals because of potential costs to small businesses if further protections are added to the city ordinances. “What we’ve seen in other places where amendments like these are passed is the cost to small business owners goes up,” La Rue said. “There is the threat of litigation anytime [businesses] fail to hire someone who is a member of the protected class.”
- Posted: 02/19/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.ktar.com
- Tags: ADF: Joe LaRue, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Arizona, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Hawaii Family Forum: Today, around 150 people gathered at the capitol to demand what they are calling “marriage equality” (another name for redefining marriage.) Tomorrow, (February 12, 2013) they plan to visit the capitol all day. The timing is critical because if nothing happens by Wednesday, than the issue will be off the table for this legislative session. That’s why the push is happening so strongly all of a sudden.
- Posted: 02/13/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.hawaiireporter.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Hawaii Family Forum, State: Hawaii, Topic: Gambling, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Marriage
Politifact: “I’m pleased with the direction the Institute is taking,” wrote Sears, who has been a board member of the group for several years. “Unlike David, I was never against same-sex marriage. But much like David, I’ve witnessed the fallout from broken families in the past several decades, during which divorce and out-of-wedlock births have skyrocketed, and unstable, serial cohabiting relationships have become the norm for raising children.”
- Posted: 02/13/2013
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.politifact.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Institute for American Values, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
|

Latest Posts
-
www.christiannewswire.com
06/18/2013
Christian Newswire: Congressman Mark Meadows (R-NC) today introduced a resolution in the U.S. House to amend the United States Constitution to protect children and parents from governmental overreach. The proposed Parental Rights Amendment already has 40 original cosponsors. ParentalRights.org leads grassroots support for the measure.
-
www.lifenews.com
06/18/2013
LifeNews: The vote for the bill broke down on mostly partisan lines with Republicans supporting the ban on late-term abortions and Democrats opposing it. The House approved the bill on a 229-195 vote with 7 Democrats voting for the bill and 6 Republicans voting against it. The bill, if it receives a vote in the Democrat-controlled Senate, is not expected to pass and pro-abortion President Barack Obama has issued a veto threat.
-
www.lifesitenews.com
06/18/2013
LifeSiteNews: The Chinese government has given notice to citizens of the city Huizhou that all women of childbearing age must be fitted with Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) or be permanently sterilized via tubal ligations.

|