<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Alameda Books Inc. v. City of Los Angeles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-alameda-books-inc-v-city-of-los-angeles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court refuses to hear Alameda books sexually oriented businesses case; no action in Bronx Household of Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-alameda-books-sexually-oriented-businesses-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-alameda-books-sexually-oriented-businesses-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: SOB Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Alameda Books Inc. v. City of Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=119485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the U.S. Supreme Court <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112811zor.pdf">refused to hear</a> <em>Los Angeles v. Alameda Books</em> Nos. 11-245, 11-379.  Document related to that litigation, the 9th Circuit opinion, and a summary of the issues involved can be found at <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/11/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-november-22-2011/">SCOTUS Blog here</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-alameda-books-sexually-oriented-businesses-case/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/11/28/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-alameda-books-sexually-oriented-businesses-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit reinstates city&#8217;s adult bookstore ordinance</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/28/9th-circuit-reinstates-citys-adult-bookstore-ordinance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/28/9th-circuit-reinstates-citys-adult-bookstore-ordinance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: SOB Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Alameda Books Inc. v. City of Los Angeles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=94075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://westlawnews.thomson.com/California_Litigation/News/2011/01_-_January/Appeals_court_reinstates_city%E2%80%99s_adult_bookstore_ordinance/">Westlaw News and Insights</a>: "The 9th Circuit has reversed a lower court's ruling that a Los Angeles ordinance prohibiting combined adult retail and arcade establishments violated the First Amendment. The court of appeals said the bookstore and arcade that brought the suit did not offer enough evidence to show that the city’s ordinance was unconstitutional."

<a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/28/09-55367.pdf"><em>Alameda Books Inc. v. City of Los Angeles</em></a>, No. 09-55367 (9th Cir. Jan. 28, 2011) <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/28/9th-circuit-reinstates-citys-adult-bookstore-ordinance/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2011/01/28/9th-circuit-reinstates-citys-adult-bookstore-ordinance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

