<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: American Atheists v. Duncan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-american-atheists-v-duncan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Possible Endorsement Test Case for the U.S. Supreme Court?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/22/a-possible-endorsement-test-case-for-the-u-s-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/22/a-possible-endorsement-test-case-for-the-u-s-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Monuments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: American Atheists v. Duncan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=88131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Yesterday, the Tenth Circuit voted 5–4 not to rehear the Utah roadside cross memorial case, American Atheists, Inc. v. Duncan. The result, and the forceful dissents from denial of rehearing en banc, make it likely that the Supreme Court will agree to hear the case, and perhaps overturn the Establishment Clause endorsement test . . . " <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/22/a-possible-endorsement-test-case-for-the-u-s-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/12/22/a-possible-endorsement-test-case-for-the-u-s-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10th Circuit: Highway patrol memorial crosses are unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/18/10th-circuit-highway-patrol-memorial-crosses-are-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/18/10th-circuit-highway-patrol-memorial-crosses-are-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 10th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: American Atheists v. Davenport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: American Atheists v. Duncan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=69267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We hold that these memorials have the impermissible effect of conveying to the reasonable observer the message that the State prefers or otherwise endorses a certain religion." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/18/10th-circuit-highway-patrol-memorial-crosses-are-unconstitutional/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2010/08/18/10th-circuit-highway-patrol-memorial-crosses-are-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

