<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; ZZ: Berg v Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/tag/zz-berg-v-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Birthers&#8217; Lose Again as Federal Judge Nixes Challenge to Obama Presidency</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/22/birthers-lose-again-as-federal-judge-nixes-challenge-to-obama-presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/22/birthers-lose-again-as-federal-judge-nixes-challenge-to-obama-presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 3rd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Berg v Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hollister v Soetoro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Kerchner v Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=39890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202434835487&#038;Birthers_Lose_Again_as_Federal_Judge_Nixes_Challenge_to_Obama_Presidency">Law.com</a>: "Simandle agreed with Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Pascal that because the plaintiffs couldn't prove they had suffered any harm that was particularized, imminent or concrete, they lacked standing to sue. A claim that alleges the entire public is threatened or raises a general grievance about government isn't a sustainable under the Article III of the constitution, Simandle ruled in Kerchner v. Obama, 09-253." The article provides updates on similar challenges that are pending.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/22/birthers-lose-again-as-federal-judge-nixes-challenge-to-obama-presidency/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2009/10/22/birthers-lose-again-as-federal-judge-nixes-challenge-to-obama-presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

